Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Start tournament #450

Merged
merged 25 commits into from
Oct 6, 2024
Merged

Start tournament #450

merged 25 commits into from
Oct 6, 2024

Conversation

thatguyinabeanie
Copy link
Owner

@thatguyinabeanie thatguyinabeanie commented Oct 4, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

Release Notes

  • New Features

    • Introduced a comprehensive suite of tests for the resistance calculation in Swiss tournaments, ensuring accurate performance evaluation.
    • Enhanced error handling checks for player and phase validations in tournament scenarios.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved robustness of the resistance calculation method to handle various match scenarios effectively.
  • Documentation

    • Updated testing documentation to reflect new test cases and scenarios for the SwissResistance calculations.
  • Chores

    • Refined testing setup to improve context establishment for tournament simulations.

Copy link

vercel bot commented Oct 4, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
battle-stadium ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Oct 6, 2024 2:23am

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 4, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request adds a comprehensive suite of RSpec tests for the Math::SwissResistance class, specifically targeting the .calculate method. It includes setups for various scenarios, error handling for invalid inputs, and tests for both no-match situations and match resolutions. The tests ensure that resistance calculations are accurate for players involved in matches, providing thorough coverage for the functionality of the class.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
backend/spec/lib/math/swiss_resistance_spec.rb - Introduced extensive RSpec tests for the Math::SwissResistance class, focusing on the .calculate method and its behavior across various scenarios, including error handling and match resolution.

Possibly related PRs

  • tournaments show method authorization #430: The changes in the TournamentsController include an authorization check for the show action, which is relevant to the ChatChannel changes that also involve authorization logic for joining chat rooms. Both PRs focus on enhancing user access control within their respective contexts.

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between a5a699b and b6170c6.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • backend/spec/lib/math/swiss_resistance_spec.rb (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
backend/spec/lib/math/swiss_resistance_spec.rb (1)

107-108: Double-check if we need to resolve bye matches

We're resolving bye matches using resolve_match_2_0, but since bye matches don't have opponents, resolving them might not be necessary. Just want to make sure this is intentional.

You can run this script to see how bye matches are being handled:


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 4, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 92.27468% with 18 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 92.55%. Comparing base (8c289c3) to head (b6170c6).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
backend/lib/math/swiss_resistance.rb 70.00% 6 Missing ⚠️
backend/app/models/phases/swiss.rb 88.57% 4 Missing ⚠️
backend/app/models/tournaments/round.rb 94.00% 3 Missing ⚠️
...ckend/app/models/concerns/match_players_concern.rb 60.00% 2 Missing ⚠️
backend/app/models/phases/base_phase.rb 75.00% 2 Missing ⚠️
...d/app/controllers/api/v1/tournaments_controller.rb 83.33% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #450      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   92.21%   92.55%   +0.33%     
==========================================
  Files          67       69       +2     
  Lines        1323     1464     +141     
==========================================
+ Hits         1220     1355     +135     
- Misses        103      109       +6     
Flag Coverage Δ
rspec 92.55% <92.27%> (+0.33%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

- Remove unnecessary whitespace in player.rb
- Update attribute name in match_serializer.rb from reported_at to ended_at

Closes #123
- Update the belongs_to association for player_one in the Match model to remove the optional flag
- Add logic to update the status of a match based on the number of wins for each player
- Create a new match game if the match is not yet decided
- Add a report! method to the MatchGame model to handle reporting the winner, loser, and reporter of a game
- Update the create_matches method in the Round model to remove the deprecated create_matches_by_record method
- Remove the seed_round method from the Round model
- Add an end! method to the Round model to end the round if all matches are completed
@thatguyinabeanie
Copy link
Owner Author

@coderabbitai review

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 6, 2024

✅ Actions performed

Review triggered.

Note: CodeRabbit is an incremental review system and does not re-review already reviewed commits. This command is applicable only when automatic reviews are paused.

@thatguyinabeanie thatguyinabeanie enabled auto-merge (squash) October 6, 2024 02:23
Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Oct 6, 2024

@thatguyinabeanie thatguyinabeanie merged commit fe8c2ce into main Oct 6, 2024
18 checks passed
@thatguyinabeanie thatguyinabeanie deleted the start-tournament branch October 6, 2024 02:30
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Oct 27, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant