Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bump Go version for CI builds to 1.22 #174

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Aug 28, 2024
Merged

Bump Go version for CI builds to 1.22 #174

merged 2 commits into from
Aug 28, 2024

Conversation

lina-temporal
Copy link
Contributor

@lina-temporal lina-temporal commented Aug 28, 2024

What changed?

  • Bumped Go version used for CI builds to 1.21

Why?

How did you test it?

  • Pending

Potential risks

@lina-temporal lina-temporal requested review from a team as code owners August 28, 2024 21:59
@lina-temporal lina-temporal changed the title Bump Go version for CI builds to 1.21 Bump Go version for CI builds to 1.22 Aug 28, 2024
Copy link
Member

@Shivs11 Shivs11 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm!

Copy link
Member

@cretz cretz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ug, I think this points out a problem we have with our automated merge script. For whatever reason we are updating every dependency blindly when we update protos in that GH workflow. This forces every user we have to upgrade their versions even if we/they don't need to.

Approving this, but am going to bring this up to team. I think forced automatic dependency upgrades are a bad thing for what is effectively Temporal's most used library by users.

@lina-temporal lina-temporal merged commit 9d01b39 into master Aug 28, 2024
3 checks passed
@lina-temporal lina-temporal deleted the bump_go_121 branch August 28, 2024 22:48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants