Editorial: eliminate extra verbosity with %GeneratorPrototype% references #3460
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Can we also get rid of this bit? (same for
|
|
@linusg I left those in intentionally because I find them helpful. |
|
I agree that overall this is a useful hint but using intrinsic syntax for something that is never referenced again is confusing IMO. FWIW this information is also available elsewhere:
|
bakkot
approved these changes
Oct 23, 2024
syg
approved these changes
Oct 30, 2024
michaelficarra
added
the
ready to merge
ljharb
force-pushed
the
prototype-prototype-prototype
branch
from
a136b63 to
4c44bbe
Compare
kimjg1119
pushed a commit
to kimjg1119/ecma262
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 20, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
%GeneratorFunction.prototype.prototype%is just%GeneratorPrototype%