Update benchmark base

[officialasishkumar]

📝 Description

Type: 🪲 bugfix

• Pass tardis-refdata via env variable
• update get_relative_path

📌 Resources

Examples, notebooks, and links to useful references.

🚦 Testing

How did you test these changes?

• Testing pipeline
• Other method (describe)
• My changes can't be tested (explain why)

☑️ Checklist

• I requested two reviewers for this pull request
• I updated the documentation according to my changes
• I built the documentation by applying the build_docs label

Note: If you are not allowed to perform any of these actions, ping (@) a contributor.

[tardis-bot]

*beep* *bop*
Hi human,
I ran ruff on the latest commit (3e09abf).
Here are the outputs produced.
Results can also be downloaded as artifacts here.
Summarised output:

1	B018  	[ ] Found useless expression. Either assign it to a variable or remove it.
1	RET506	[ ] Unnecessary `else` after `raise` statement
1	I001  	[*] Import block is un-sorted or un-formatted
1	W292  	[*] No newline at end of file

Complete output(might be large):

asv.conf.json:1:1: B018 Found useless expression. Either assign it to a variable or remove it.
asv.conf.json:32:2: W292 [*] No newline at end of file
benchmarks/benchmark_base.py:1:1: I001 [*] Import block is un-sorted or un-formatted
benchmarks/benchmark_base.py:75:9: RET506 Unnecessary `else` after `raise` statement
Found 4 errors.
[*] 2 fixable with the `--fix` option.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 69.32%. Comparing base (2df54e5) to head (3e09abf).
Report is 7 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #2788      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   69.87%   69.32%   -0.55%     
==========================================
  Files         205      205              
  Lines       15440    15440              
==========================================
- Hits        10788    10704      -84     
- Misses       4652     4736      +84     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[officialasishkumar]

does the atom_data needs to be passed by a different env variable?

[tardis-bot]

*beep* *bop*
Hi human,
I ran benchmarks as you asked comparing master (2df54e5) and the latest commit (3e09abf).
Here are the logs produced by ASV.
Results can also be downloaded as artifacts here.

Significantly changed benchmarks:

All benchmarks:

Benchmarks that have stayed the same:

| Change   | Before [2df54e5d] <master>   | After [3e09abf2]    | Ratio   | Benchmark (Parameter)                                                                                                               |
|----------|------------------------------|---------------------|---------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|          | 4.84±0.02ms                  | 7.19±0.01ms         | ~1.49   | opacities_opacity_state.BenchmarkOpacitiesOpacityState.time_opacity_state_initialize('macroatom')                                   |
|          | 2.57±0.5ms                   | 2.95±0.7ms          | ~1.15   | transport_montecarlo_single_packet_loop.BenchmarkTransportMontecarloSinglePacketLoop.time_single_packet_loop                        |
|          | 3.07±0.8μs                   | 3.43±0.7μs          | ~1.12   | transport_montecarlo_vpacket.BenchmarkMontecarloMontecarloNumbaVpacket.time_trace_bad_vpacket                                       |
|          | 6.75±1μs                     | 6.05±1μs            | ~0.90   | transport_montecarlo_vpacket.BenchmarkMontecarloMontecarloNumbaVpacket.time_trace_vpacket                                           |
|          | 51.9±20μs                    | 46.0±20μs           | ~0.89   | transport_montecarlo_interaction.BenchmarkTransportMontecarloInteraction.time_line_scatter                                          |
|          | 56.3±10μs                    | 43.2±20μs           | ~0.77   | transport_montecarlo_interaction.BenchmarkTransportMontecarloInteraction.time_line_emission                                         |
|          | 2.62±0.01ms                  | 2.87±0ms            | 1.09    | opacities_opacity_state.BenchmarkOpacitiesOpacityState.time_opacity_state_initialize('scatter')                                     |
|          | 541±100ns                    | 570±200ns           | 1.05    | opacities_opacity.BenchmarkMontecarloMontecarloNumbaOpacities.time_pair_creation_opacity_calculation                                |
|          | 2.00±1μs                     | 2.09±0.8μs          | 1.04    | transport_montecarlo_estimators_radfield_estimator_calcs.BenchmarkMontecarloMontecarloNumbaPacket.time_update_line_estimators       |
|          | 7.69±2μs                     | 8.01±2μs            | 1.04    | transport_montecarlo_vpacket.BenchmarkMontecarloMontecarloNumbaVpacket.time_trace_vpacket_volley                                    |
|          | 30.6±0.03μs                  | 31.4±0.05μs         | 1.03    | transport_montecarlo_packet_trackers.BenchmarkTransportMontecarloPacketTrackers.time_generate_rpacket_tracker_list                  |
|          | 521±200ns                    | 531±200ns           | 1.02    | opacities_opacity.BenchmarkMontecarloMontecarloNumbaOpacities.time_compton_opacity_calculation                                      |
|          | 206±0.2ns                    | 209±0.3ns           | 1.02    | spectrum_formal_integral.BenchmarkTransportMontecarloFormalIntegral.time_intensity_black_body                                       |
|          | 1.34±0.4μs                   | 1.37±0.4μs          | 1.02    | transport_geometry_calculate_distances.BenchmarkTransportGeometryCalculateDistances.time_calculate_distance_line                    |
|          | 62.0±0.2ms                   | 63.3±0.03ms         | 1.02    | transport_montecarlo_packet_trackers.BenchmarkTransportMontecarloPacketTrackers.time_rpacket_trackers_to_dataframe                  |
|          | 1.65±0ms                     | 1.66±0.01ms         | 1.01    | transport_montecarlo_main_loop.BenchmarkTransportMontecarloMontecarloMainLoop.time_montecarlo_main_loop                             |
|          | 39.0±0.01s                   | 38.8±0.03s          | 1.00    | run_tardis.BenchmarkRunTardis.time_run_tardis                                                                                       |
|          | 1.05±0m                      | 1.05±0m             | 1.00    | run_tardis.BenchmarkRunTardis.time_run_tardis_rpacket_tracking                                                                      |
|          | 2.06±0m                      | 2.06±0m             | 1.00    | spectrum_formal_integral.BenchmarkTransportMontecarloFormalIntegral.time_FormalIntegrator_functions                                 |
|          | 1.20±0μs                     | 1.21±0μs            | 1.00    | transport_geometry_calculate_distances.BenchmarkTransportGeometryCalculateDistances.time_calculate_distance_boundary                |
|          | 726±0.3ns                    | 721±0.3ns           | 0.99    | transport_montecarlo_interaction.BenchmarkTransportMontecarloInteraction.time_thomson_scatter                                       |
|          | 19.7±4μs                     | 19.5±4μs            | 0.99    | transport_montecarlo_packet_trackers.BenchmarkTransportMontecarloPacketTrackers.time_generate_rpacket_last_interaction_tracker_list |
|          | 3.38±0.6μs                   | 3.34±0.6μs          | 0.99    | transport_montecarlo_vpacket.BenchmarkMontecarloMontecarloNumbaVpacket.time_trace_vpacket_within_shell                              |
|          | 581±200ns                    | 532±200ns           | 0.92    | opacities_opacity.BenchmarkMontecarloMontecarloNumbaOpacities.time_photoabsorption_opacity_calculation                              |

If you want to see the graph of the results, you can check it here

[andrewfullard]

from os get environ perhaps