Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

feat(nfts): non-transferable snaefell nfts #17373

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
May 27, 2024
Merged

feat(nfts): non-transferable snaefell nfts #17373

merged 3 commits into from
May 27, 2024

Conversation

bearni95
Copy link
Contributor

code + tests

@openzeppelin-code OpenZeppelin Code
Copy link

openzeppelin-code bot commented May 27, 2024 •
edited
Loading

feat(nfts): non-transferable snaefell nfts

Generated at commit: b69090c57742d47182128adc584427317e20cf25

🚨 Report Summary

Severity Level Results
Contracts Critical
High
Medium
Low
Note
Total		 2
2
0
8
42
54
Dependencies Critical
High
Medium
Low
Note
Total		 0
0
0
0
0
0

For more details view the full report in OpenZeppelin Code Inspector

@bearni95 bearni95 enabled auto-merge May 27, 2024 16:29
@bearni95 bearni95 added this pull request to the merge queue May 27, 2024
Merged via the queue into main with commit cde9683 May 27, 2024
5 checks passed
@bearni95 bearni95 deleted the soulbound-snaefell branch May 27, 2024 16:34
@taiko-kitty taiko-kitty mentioned this pull request May 27, 2024
Closed
@taiko-kitty taiko-kitty mentioned this pull request Jun 13, 2024
Closed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@KorbinianK KorbinianK KorbinianK approved these changes

@YoGhurt111 YoGhurt111 YoGhurt111 approved these changes

@dantaik dantaik Awaiting requested review from dantaik

@dionysuzx dionysuzx Awaiting requested review from dionysuzx

@adaki2004 adaki2004 Awaiting requested review from adaki2004

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
3 participants
@bearni95 @KorbinianK @YoGhurt111