Skip to content

Actions: tact-lang/tact

Actions

All workflows

Actions

Loading...
Loading

Showing runs from all workflows
7,184 workflow runs
7,184 workflow runs

Filter by Event

Filter by Status

Filter by Branch

Filter by Actor

fix: support T and T? methods with the same name Tact CI #2618: Pull request #1758 synchronize by i582
February 10, 2025 10:34 17m 24s pmakhnev/optional-methods
pmakhnev/optional-methods
February 10, 2025 10:34 17m 24s
PR #1758 CodeQL #1404: by i582
February 10, 2025 10:34 1m 56s refs/pull/1758/head
refs/pull/1758/head
February 10, 2025 10:34 1m 56s
Passing a result of an assembly function call with void (unspecified) return value as an argument optimizes away the call to that assembly function Comment #1447: Issue comment #1201 (comment) created by anton-trunov
February 10, 2025 10:27 1s
February 10, 2025 10:27 1s
fix: support T and T? methods with the same name Linter check #342: Pull request #1758 synchronize by i582
February 10, 2025 10:27 2m 6s pmakhnev/optional-methods
pmakhnev/optional-methods
February 10, 2025 10:27 2m 6s
fix: support T and T? methods with the same name Tact CI #2617: Pull request #1758 synchronize by i582
February 10, 2025 10:27 13m 59s pmakhnev/optional-methods
pmakhnev/optional-methods
February 10, 2025 10:27 13m 59s
PR #1758 CodeQL #1403: by i582
February 10, 2025 10:25 2m 2s refs/pull/1758/head
refs/pull/1758/head
February 10, 2025 10:25 2m 2s
fix: forbid strings in ASM functions until we have proper grammar for it Tact CI #2616: Pull request #1757 synchronize by i582
February 10, 2025 10:17 14m 16s pmakhnev/forbid-strings-in-asm-functions-for-now
pmakhnev/forbid-strings-in-asm-functions-for-now
February 10, 2025 10:17 14m 16s
fix: forbid strings in ASM functions until we have proper grammar for it Linter check #341: Pull request #1757 synchronize by i582
February 10, 2025 10:17 2m 58s pmakhnev/forbid-strings-in-asm-functions-for-now
pmakhnev/forbid-strings-in-asm-functions-for-now
February 10, 2025 10:17 2m 58s
PR #1757 CodeQL #1402: by i582
February 10, 2025 10:17 1m 58s refs/pull/1757/head
refs/pull/1757/head
February 10, 2025 10:17 1m 58s
fix: support T and T? methods with the same name Linter check #340: Pull request #1758 synchronize by i582
February 10, 2025 09:33 4m 8s pmakhnev/optional-methods
pmakhnev/optional-methods
February 10, 2025 09:33 4m 8s
fix: support T and T? methods with the same name Tact CI #2615: Pull request #1758 synchronize by i582
February 10, 2025 09:33 14m 59s pmakhnev/optional-methods
pmakhnev/optional-methods
February 10, 2025 09:33 14m 59s
PR #1758 CodeQL #1401: by i582
February 10, 2025 09:33 1m 56s refs/pull/1758/head
refs/pull/1758/head
February 10, 2025 09:33 1m 56s
fix: forbid strings in ASM functions until we have proper grammar for it Linter check #339: Pull request #1757 synchronize by i582
February 10, 2025 09:21 4m 30s pmakhnev/forbid-strings-in-asm-functions-for-now
pmakhnev/forbid-strings-in-asm-functions-for-now
February 10, 2025 09:21 4m 30s
fix: forbid strings in ASM functions until we have proper grammar for it Tact CI #2614: Pull request #1757 synchronize by i582
February 10, 2025 09:21 21m 5s pmakhnev/forbid-strings-in-asm-functions-for-now
pmakhnev/forbid-strings-in-asm-functions-for-now
February 10, 2025 09:21 21m 5s
PR #1757 CodeQL #1400: by i582
February 10, 2025 09:21 4m 3s refs/pull/1757/head
refs/pull/1757/head
February 10, 2025 09:21 4m 3s
feat: better errors Linter check #338: Pull request #1759 opened by verytactical
February 10, 2025 09:20 3m 18s errors
errors
February 10, 2025 09:20 3m 18s
feat: better errors Pull request #239: Pull request #1759 opened by verytactical
February 10, 2025 09:20 1m 10s errors
errors
February 10, 2025 09:20 1m 10s
feat: better errors Tact CI #2613: Pull request #1759 opened by verytactical
February 10, 2025 09:20 15m 39s errors
errors
February 10, 2025 09:20 15m 39s
PR #1759 CodeQL #1399: by verytactical
February 10, 2025 09:19 2m 57s refs/pull/1759/head
refs/pull/1759/head
February 10, 2025 09:19 2m 57s
Improve error printing Comment #1446: Issue comment #1202 (comment) created by verytactical
February 10, 2025 09:18 2s
February 10, 2025 09:18 2s
fix: support T and T? methods with the same name Linter check #337: Pull request #1758 opened by i582
February 10, 2025 09:18 2m 19s pmakhnev/optional-methods
pmakhnev/optional-methods
February 10, 2025 09:18 2m 19s
fix: support T and T? methods with the same name Tact CI #2612: Pull request #1758 opened by i582
February 10, 2025 09:18 5m 30s pmakhnev/optional-methods
pmakhnev/optional-methods
February 10, 2025 09:18 5m 30s
fix: support T and T? methods with the same name Pull request #238: Pull request #1758 opened by i582
February 10, 2025 09:18 2m 10s pmakhnev/optional-methods
pmakhnev/optional-methods
February 10, 2025 09:18 2m 10s
PR #1758 CodeQL #1398: by i582
February 10, 2025 09:18 2m 6s refs/pull/1758/head
refs/pull/1758/head
February 10, 2025 09:18 2m 6s
Passing a result of an assembly function call with void (unspecified) return value as an argument optimizes away the call to that assembly function Comment #1445: Issue comment #1201 (comment) created by Gusarich
February 10, 2025 09:04 3s
February 10, 2025 09:04 3s