Final fixes #221
Merged
Final fixes #221
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This is what the PeerJ staff have changed the references in the paper to use.
|
If anyone knows how to fix the references (see #220) please feel free to push changes up here, and I will add annotations to the proof (or if you don't want to push a change, just comment here what it should be). |
isuruf-bot
pushed a commit
to isuruf-bot/sympy-paper
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 8, 2016
isuruf-bot
pushed a commit
to isuruf-bot/sympy-paper
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 9, 2016
isuruf-bot
pushed a commit
to isuruf-bot/sympy-paper
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 9, 2016
isuruf-bot
pushed a commit
to isuruf-bot/sympy-paper
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 12, 2016
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Some final fixes, related to #220.
As far as I know, we will not be resubmitting the paper itself, only pointing out changes in the annotations on the proof. So changes to the paper here are only for posterity, so that the paper here matches the final published version (at least in content). If someone wants, they can also bring in other changes from the proof (mainly, I noticed they changed the spelling section references in the text, and abbreviated US state names in the affiliations).
We way wish to resubmit the supplement, as it has removed line numbers, and section numbers starting with S (the PeerJ staff have changed the references in the paper to use the "Section S1" format in their proof).