Clone container contents instead of container itself #22
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
When the line
wrap.html(container.html());
was changed towrap.html(container.clone(true));
it fixed the problem of JS events getting lost, but now instead of copying the container content, it makes a duplicate of the container itself. This duplication leads to problems with the default videoBG usage, as it creates another<body>
element within the main<body>
element, which in turn causes incompatibilities with other plugins and code that perform operations on$(“body”)
.This commit still uses the jQuery clone() method to maintain JS events, but instead of cloning the container, it clones the container’s children (i.e. its content) into the videoBG wrapper.