-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 111
Diagnose when we incorrectly infer the type of a capture list item in an exit test. #1152
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
grynspan
wants to merge
7
commits into
main
Choose a base branch
from
jgrynspan/diagnose-mistyped-exit-test-capture
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…t test. This PR adds the ability to infer the type of a parameter of a function or closure that encloses an exit test. For example, `x` here: ```swift func f(x: Int) async { await #expect(processExitsWith: .failure) { [x] in ... } } ``` This inference still fails if a parameter is shadowed by a variable with an incompatible type; we still need something like `decltype()` to solve for such cases. Still, being able to capture `@Test` function arguments with minimal ceremony is helpful: ```swift @test(arguments: 0 ..< 100) func f(i: Int) async { await #expect(exitsWith: .failure) { [i] in ... } } ```
grynspan
commented
Jun 13, 2025
|
||
// Diagnose that the type of 'expr' is invalid. | ||
let name = nameExpr.representedLiteralValue ?? expr.trimmedDescription | ||
let capture = ClosureCaptureSyntax(name: .identifier(name)) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This fake ClosureCaptureSyntax
instance is created because we can't pass such a thing as an expression and we need to use a string instead. It's a temporary abstraction until swiftlang/swift-syntax#3085 is resolved.
@swift-ci test |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement
New feature or request
exit-tests
☠️ Work related to exit tests
parameterized-testing
Related to parameterized testing functionality
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Follow-up to #1130, split out for clarity.
This PR adds a custom diagnostic at compile time if we incorrectly infer the type of a captured function argument or
self
in an exit test. For example:This improves our feedback to the developer when we encounter a pattern like that. The developer will now see:
Checklist: