Skip to content

BackTracking-1 #1035

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

BackTracking-1 #1035

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

Mounika8300
Copy link

No description provided.

@super30admin
Copy link
Owner

  1. Correctness:

    • CombinationSum.java: The solution correctly implements backtracking to find all combinations of candidates that sum up to the target. It handles the base cases and recursive logic appropriately.
    • ExpressionAdd.java: The solution correctly uses DFS with backtracking to explore all possible operator insertions. It handles leading zeros and multiplication precedence correctly.
  2. Time Complexity:

    • CombinationSum.java: The student correctly identifies the time complexity as O(2^n), which is accurate for this backtracking approach.
    • ExpressionAdd.java: The student claims O(n) time complexity, which is incorrect. The actual time complexity is O(4^n) due to the branching factor of 4 (+, -, *, no operator) at each step.
  3. Space Complexity:

    • CombinationSum.java: The student correctly identifies the space complexity as O(n), which accounts for the recursion stack.
    • ExpressionAdd.java: The student claims O(n) space complexity, which is incorrect. The actual space complexity is O(n) due to the recursion stack, but the explanation should clarify this.
  4. Code Quality:

    • CombinationSum.java: The code is well-structured and readable. The use of this.result is unnecessary since the variable is already in scope.
    • ExpressionAdd.java: The code is generally clean and readable. The use of System.out.println(currentStr) is unnecessary and should be removed for production code.
  5. Efficiency:

    • CombinationSum.java: The solution is efficient for the problem. No major optimizations are needed.
    • ExpressionAdd.java: The solution is efficient but could benefit from a comment explaining the handling of multiplication precedence (lastOperand).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants