-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Index / Reindex institutions from OpenGeoMetadata into EarthWorks #591
Comments
@jkeck has already done some work to reindex stage and prod for OpenGeoMetadata records (not OGP). Lets scope out of this ticket OGP. Maybe the next step is to add and evaluate into stage:
And get feedback from the GIS team. |
There were some issues with indexing the edu.uarizona data, so I think maybe only edu.cornell is what we should be looking at. |
via @kimdurante on #836:
|
currently we're set up to index these institutions: earthworks/lib/tasks/earthworks.rake Lines 121 to 127 in 9e497e1
@kimdurante are we interested in indexing from any other institutions? it looks like harvard has a lot of records available, and i also see listings in OGM for penn and penn state along with several other institutions. |
Hi @thatbudakguy |
@kimdurante definitely! would you want to just update the institutions we currently hold, or also pull in newer ones from OGM like Iowa, George Mason, Arizona, etc.? |
I'd say all of them - old & new. |
@kimdurante ok, I've reharvested everything (except stanford records) and the result is visible in staging at https://earthworks-stage.stanford.edu/. let me know how it looks. |
@kimdurante did you get a chance to look at staging? maybe this notification got lost |
Hi @thatbudakguy! Sorry, I did not respond sooner. I am out until Thursday, I will report back then. Thanks! |
Looks great to me @thatbudakguy |
blocked by OpenGeoMetadata/GeoCombine#130 because we don't want to index aardvark metadata and get a ton of errors while reindexing. |
making some notes for myself as I test indexing in staging:
|
notes from meeting with @kimdurante:
|
update: massGIS contacted; they are looking into the possibility of hosting on OGM. for now, we will live without their records. remaining tasks:
|
This is preparation for building a new production core for EW. The core will be populated with Stanford data and a fresh reindex of OpenGeoMetadata records, then swapped into prod and UAT. Ref sul-dlss/earthworks#591
This is preparation for building a new production core for EW. The core will be populated with Stanford data and a fresh reindex of OpenGeoMetadata records, then swapped into prod and UAT. Ref sul-dlss/earthworks#591
updates are live! |
Currently this is handled using a variety of scripts.
From OGP data: https://github.com/sul-dlss/earthworks/tree/master/scripts/indexing/ogp
And in rake tasks: https://github.com/sul-dlss/earthworks/blob/master/lib/tasks/earthworks.rake#L115-L153
To complete this ticket we should probably do the following:
design a new tool/process if we need to handle this indexingpunting on this for nowThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: