Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jan 24, 2024. It is now read-only.

[Snyk] Security upgrade io.streamnative:pulsar-broker from 3.0.0.1 to 3.0.1.6 #2025

Closed

Conversation

BewareMyPower
Copy link
Collaborator

This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.


Snyk has created this PR to fix one or more vulnerable packages in the `maven` dependencies of this project.

Changes included in this PR

  • Changes to the following files to upgrade the vulnerable dependencies to a fixed version:
    • pom.xml

Vulnerabilities that will be fixed

With an upgrade:
Severity Priority Score (*) Issue Upgrade Breaking Change Exploit Maturity
low severity 399/1000
Why? Has a fix available, CVSS 3.7
Improper Input Validation
SNYK-JAVA-ORGAPACHEAVRO-5926693
io.streamnative:pulsar-broker:
3.0.0.1 -> 3.0.1.6
No No Known Exploit
medium severity 539/1000
Why? Has a fix available, CVSS 6.5
Denial of Service (DoS)
SNYK-JAVA-ORGAPACHECOMMONS-1316638
io.streamnative:pulsar-broker:
3.0.0.1 -> 3.0.1.6
No No Known Exploit
medium severity 539/1000
Why? Has a fix available, CVSS 6.5
Denial of Service (DoS)
SNYK-JAVA-ORGAPACHECOMMONS-1316639
io.streamnative:pulsar-broker:
3.0.0.1 -> 3.0.1.6
No No Known Exploit
medium severity 539/1000
Why? Has a fix available, CVSS 6.5
Denial of Service (DoS)
SNYK-JAVA-ORGAPACHECOMMONS-1316640
io.streamnative:pulsar-broker:
3.0.0.1 -> 3.0.1.6
No No Known Exploit
high severity 589/1000
Why? Has a fix available, CVSS 7.5
Denial of Service (DoS)
SNYK-JAVA-ORGAPACHECOMMONS-1316641
io.streamnative:pulsar-broker:
3.0.0.1 -> 3.0.1.6
No No Known Exploit
high severity 696/1000
Why? Proof of Concept exploit, Has a fix available, CVSS 7.5
Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
SNYK-JAVA-ORGXERIALSNAPPY-5918282
io.streamnative:pulsar-broker:
3.0.0.1 -> 3.0.1.6
No Proof of Concept

(*) Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.

Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.


Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.

For more information:
🧐 View latest project report

🛠 Adjust project settings

📚 Read more about Snyk's upgrade and patch logic


Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:

🦉 Improper Input Validation
🦉 Denial of Service (DoS)
🦉 Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling

@CLAassistant
Copy link

CLA assistant check
Thank you for your submission! We really appreciate it. Like many open source projects, we ask that you sign our Contributor License Agreement before we can accept your contribution.
You have signed the CLA already but the status is still pending? Let us recheck it.

Copy link

@BewareMyPower:Thanks for your contribution. For this PR, do we need to update docs?
(The PR template contains info about doc, which helps others know more about the changes. Can you provide doc-related info in this and future PR descriptions? Thanks)

@github-actions github-actions bot added the doc-info-missing This pr needs to mark a document option in description label Oct 31, 2023
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 31, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #2025 (29518d8) into master (aa2f171) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##             master    #2025   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage     16.98%   16.98%           
  Complexity      730      730           
=========================================
  Files           191      191           
  Lines         14310    14310           
  Branches       1339     1339           
=========================================
  Hits           2430     2430           
  Misses        11704    11704           
  Partials        176      176           

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
doc-info-missing This pr needs to mark a document option in description
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants