[fix][transaction] Handle some failures in transaction

[gaoran10]

Modifications

Handle some failures while writing transaction logs and markers.

Documentation

Check the box below.

Need to update docs?

• doc-required

  (If you need help on updating docs, create a doc issue)

• no-need-doc

  (Please explain why)

• doc

  (If this PR contains doc changes)

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #1977 (bc0b43a) into master (20e4886) will decrease coverage by 0.67%.
Report is 9 commits behind head on master.
The diff coverage is 0.00%.

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master    #1977      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     17.72%   17.06%   -0.67%     
+ Complexity      752      728      -24     
============================================
  Files           195      191       -4     
  Lines         14174    14232      +58     
  Branches       1325     1332       +7     
============================================
- Hits           2512     2428      -84     
- Misses        11480    11628     +148     
+ Partials        182      176       -6     

Files Changed	Coverage Δ
...pulsar/handlers/kop/KafkaServiceConfiguration.java	76.70% <0.00%> (ø)
...oordinator/transaction/TransactionCoordinator.java	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
...r/transaction/TransactionMarkerChannelManager.java	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
...sar/handlers/kop/storage/ProducerStateManager.java	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)

... and 14 files with indirect coverage changes

[Demogorgon314]

Removing the value in the map may cause Recursive update error.

[Demogorgon314]

Here is an example:

ConcurrentHashMap<String, String> map = new ConcurrentHashMap<>();
        map.computeIfAbsent("test", key -> {
            map.remove("test");
            return "test";
        });