Remove redundant and faulty test schema

[DoctorJohn]

Description

Some Litestar-specific tests were using an outdated copy of the schema used by all other integration tests. This PR removes the redundant schema.

Types of Changes

• Core
• Bugfix
• New feature
• Enhancement/optimization
• Documentation

Summary by Sourcery

Remove the redundant Litestar test schema and use the shared schema.

Enhancements:

• Use the shared schema for Litestar tests.

Tests:

• Remove redundant Litestar-specific test schema.

[sourcery-ai]

Reviewer's Guide by Sourcery

This PR removes a redundant test schema that was specific to Litestar and replaces it with the shared schema used in other integration tests. This simplifies the test setup and ensures consistency across different test suites.

No diagrams generated as the changes look simple and do not need a visual representation.

File-Level Changes

Change	Details	Files
Removed the Litestar-specific test schema and updated the import to use the shared schema.	Removed the tests/litestar/schema.py file. Updated the import in tests/litestar/app.py to use tests/views/schema instead of tests/litestar/schema.	tests/litestar/app.py tests/litestar/schema.py

---

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

• Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
• Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
• Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
  issue from a review comment by replying to it.
• Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
  request title to generate a title at any time.
• Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
  the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time. You can also use
  this command to specify where the summary should be inserted.

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

• Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
  summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
• Change the review language.
• Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
• Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

• Contact our support team for questions or feedback.
• Visit our documentation for detailed guides and information.
• Keep in touch with the Sourcery team by following us on X/Twitter, LinkedIn or GitHub.

[sourcery-ai]

Hey @DoctorJohn - I've reviewed your changes and they look great!

Here's what I looked at during the review

• 🟢 General issues: all looks good
• 🟢 Security: all looks good
• 🟢 Testing: all looks good
• 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
• 🟢 Documentation: all looks good

---

Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨

• X
• Mastodon
• LinkedIn
• Facebook

_{Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.}

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 97.23%. Comparing base (d983130) to head (be5a87b).
Report is 3 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #3736      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   97.12%   97.23%   +0.10%     
==========================================
  Files         503      502       -1     
  Lines       33524    33421     -103     
  Branches     5507     5481      -26     
==========================================
- Hits        32561    32496      -65     
+ Misses        756      718      -38     
  Partials      207      207              

[codspeed-hq]

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #3736 will not alter performance

_{Comparing DoctorJohn:remove-redundant-and-faulty-test-schema (be5a87b) with main (d983130)}

Summary

✅ 21 untouched benchmarks