Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

e2sm_rc: update Slice-level PRB quota param ids #29

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

pgawlowicz
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

@@ -56,15 +56,15 @@ def send_control_request_style_2_action_6(self, e2_node_id, ue_id, min_prb_ratio
{'ranParameter-ID': 1, 'ranParameter-valueType': ('ranP-Choice-List', {'ranParameter-List': {'list-of-ranParameter': [{'sequence-of-ranParameters': [
{'ranParameter-ID': 3, 'ranParameter-valueType': ('ranP-Choice-Structure', {'ranParameter-Structure': {'sequence-of-ranParameters': [
{'ranParameter-ID': 4, 'ranParameter-valueType': ('ranP-Choice-List', {'ranParameter-List': {'list-of-ranParameter': [{'sequence-of-ranParameters': [

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Shouldn't this param RRM Policy Member List ID be ranParameter-ID: 5 (currently it's 4) based on the specifications?

Specifications image

Also, sorry if this is a silly question, but I'm wondering why does control message ignore the first STRUCTURE type elements of the list, such as RRM Policy Ratio Group - ID 2 and RRM Policy Member - ID 6 RAN parameters?

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

indeed, sth is wrong, i will investigate it. Thanks for pointing out.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants