Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: ADDON-67423 improve backend error responses #1068

Draft
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

sgoral-splunk
Copy link
Contributor

This feature extends the current "Errors in the add-on" panel with the ability to perform a search with sourcetype=splunkd
image

Searching for splunkd filters errors only for the specified add-on by adding a condition checking the name of the scheme:
_internal source=/opt/splunk/var/log/splunk/splunkd.log log_level=ERROR component=ModularInputs (scheme IN ({input_names}))

@soleksy-splunk soleksy-splunk force-pushed the feat/ADDON_68580_improve_backend_responses branch from 339c1fd to ffa5dff Compare February 15, 2024 17:05
@sgoral-splunk sgoral-splunk marked this pull request as ready for review February 16, 2024 09:14
@sgoral-splunk sgoral-splunk requested a review from a team as a code owner February 16, 2024 09:14
Copy link
Contributor

@vtsvetkov-splunk vtsvetkov-splunk left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

please don't forget to update the PR title according to conventional commit rules

@sgoral-splunk sgoral-splunk changed the title Feat/addon 68580 improve backend responses feat: addon 68580 improve backend responses Feb 20, 2024
@vtsvetkov-splunk vtsvetkov-splunk changed the title feat: addon 68580 improve backend responses feat: ADDON-67423 improve backend error responses Feb 20, 2024
@artemrys artemrys marked this pull request as draft April 19, 2024 14:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants