spine-tools SpineOpt.jl Ideas Discussions
Ideas Discussions
An open-ended discussion for new features or improvements
-
You must be logged in to vote -
You must be logged in to vote -
You must be logged in to vote -
You must be logged in to vote -
You must be logged in to vote -
You must be logged in to vote -
You must be logged in to vote -
You must be logged in to vote Investments in increased connection capacity with PTDF and LODF physics
Zone: model implementationHow the formulation is implemented in code Type: new featureAdd something that doesn't exist yet -
You must be logged in to vote -
You must be logged in to vote -
You must be logged in to vote -
You must be logged in to vote Handle variable duration "Month" and "Year"
Type: new featureAdd something that doesn't exist yet -
You must be logged in to vote -
You must be logged in to vote -
You must be logged in to vote -
You must be logged in to vote -
You must be logged in to vote -
You must be logged in to vote More robust approach to data structure migration
Type: new featureAdd something that doesn't exist yet Zone: integration & updatesHow to always play nice with others (Toolbox, Julia, etc) -
You must be logged in to vote -
You must be logged in to vote Option to initially relax integer variables in Benders sub problems
Zone: formulationHow the model is formulated Type: new featureAdd something that doesn't exist yet -
You must be logged in to vote -
You must be logged in to vote More robust method to specify the 'receiving' node for PTDF/LODF constraint
Zone: model implementationHow the formulation is implemented in code -
You must be logged in to vote -
You must be logged in to vote Remove stochastic scenenario from output data
Zone: output & feedbackEverything SpineOpt returns to the dev/user Type: improvementImprove something that already exists -
You must be logged in to vote
