Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support Ed25519 signature algorithm #248

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 17, 2024
Merged

Conversation

lorenz
Copy link
Contributor

@lorenz lorenz commented Nov 15, 2023

This adds support for the Ed25519 signature algorithm which is supported by Go, but was not fully plumbed through in go-spiffe.

Copy link
Member

@azdagron azdagron left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks, @lorenz !

@azdagron
Copy link
Member

@lorenz can you grant maintainers the ability to push commits on this PR? (there is a checkbox). Otherwise, you and I will need to coordinate the merge (it needs to be up-to-date, which I can't do unless permitted)

@lorenz
Copy link
Contributor Author

lorenz commented Jan 17, 2024

I generally always enable this, but apparently GitHub doesn't let you do this if the repo is in an organization (https://github.com/orgs/community/discussions/5634). I can rebase onto whatever you need, just tell me.

@azdagron
Copy link
Member

Feel free to just merge in the latest main (or use Update Branch button) and I'll make sure this is merged next.

This adds support for the Ed25519 signature algorithm which is supported
by Go, but was not fully plumbed through in go-spiffe.

Signed-off-by: Lorenz Brun <[email protected]>
@lorenz
Copy link
Contributor Author

lorenz commented Jan 17, 2024

Rebased

@azdagron azdagron merged commit be65809 into spiffe:main Jan 17, 2024
6 checks passed
@lorenz lorenz deleted the ed25519 branch January 18, 2024 00:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants