Add flowers to loadout

[JustArt1m]

About the PR

Added poppy and lily head flowers.
Added flower wreath, poppy flower and lily flower to loadout.

Why / Balance

Just for more customization of loadout.

Media

Requirements

• I have read and am following the Pull Request and Changelog Guidelines.
• I have added media to this PR or it does not require an ingame showcase.

Changelog
🆑 Just_Art

• add: Added poppy and lily head flowers!
• add: Added flower wreath, poppy flower and lily flower to loadout!

[beck-thompson]

See: #30079 and #29302 for more discussion.

[JustArt1m]

See: #30079 and #29302 for more discussion.

So I will still need to make second versions of these flowers in order to exclude the possibility of using them outside the cosmetic context?

[beck-thompson]

So I will still need to make second versions of these flowers in order to exclude the possibility of using them outside the cosmetic context?

Unknown. The maintainers switched back and fourth between which version they wanted 🤷
I love the idea so I just hope it gets added in some version!

[slarticodefast]

Unknown. The maintainers switched back and fourth between which version they wanted 🤷

That maintainer discussion was way too long last time. Medical flowers might cause metagaming issues as they have a significant amount how healing reagents inside them and loadouts should be mostly for visual customization. The suggestion we finally came up with was that another "hairflower" item with a new item sprite should be made (in contrast to a "fake poppy"), similar to the one that had been removed when flowers were changed to be wearable. The worn sprite could be the same as the poppy's. The flower wreath is probably fine.

[SlamBamActionman]

What Slart said. In addition, since Lillies are a mutation botanists have to work towards, I personally don't think they should be a roundstart cosmetic item. Makes botany still have a reason to make flowers for cosmetic purposes.

[Boaz1111]

What Slart said. In addition, since Lillies are a mutation botanists have to work towards, I personally don't think they should be a roundstart cosmetic item. Makes botany still have a reason to make flowers for cosmetic purposes.

Agree with Slam on this one, I love making hairflower lilies for the crew, and I think people being able to just spawn with them would be weird.

[github-actions]

RSI Diff Bot; head commit 30b4c29 merging into 2a58fa1
This PR makes changes to 1 or more RSIs. Here is a summary of all changes:

Resources/Textures/Clothing/Head/Misc/hairflower.rsi

State	Old	New	Status
equipped-HELMET			Added
icon			Added

Edit: diff updated after 30b4c29

[lzk228]

and we are back to hairflowers... that were removed in #25475

[slarticodefast]

and we are back to hairflowers... that were removed in #25475

We did not have loadouts back then and people want their drip

[bruhmogus]

why are these entire flowers as opposed to just using the normal preexisting poppy and lily?

[JustArt1m]

why are these entire flowers as opposed to just using the normal preexisting poppy and lily?

#32097 (comment)

[slarticodefast]

Ok, you might have misunderstood my comment, sorry if I was unclear. The loadout hairflower should not be a poppy at all, since this causes confusion with the botany plant. The new sprite makes this even worse: The hair flower is a whole plant while the botany produce is only a flower (you would not put a whole plant stem into your hair). Also I agree with Slam that the lily should be only available through botany.

So to reiterate, could you:

• remove the lily
• Resprite the item icon for the hairflower, so that it does not resemble the poppy, but some other, unspecific red flower
• rename it to "hairflower"

The worn sprite for the hairflower and the flower wreath can stay the way they are.

[JustArt1m]

@slarticodefast

[UbaserB]

can you make the middle of the flower sprite a bunch darker please