Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[ECO-4936] Implement the ability to attach and detach a room #2

Conversation

ruancomelli
Copy link
Collaborator

Based on the simplified requirements described in #19. This doesn’t include the emission of a room status change; will do that in a separate PR.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced a new mock implementation for real-time channels, enhancing testing capabilities.
    • Added asynchronous methods for attaching and detaching channels, improving usability within Swift's concurrency model.
    • Implemented new protocols for real-time client interactions, streamlining channel management.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved error handling in the attach and detach methods to ensure consistent behavior during failures.
  • Tests

    • Added unit tests for the DefaultRoom class to validate channel attachment and detachment functionality.

I didn’t know about this feature in 646c220.
Based on the simplified requirements described in #19. This doesn’t
include the emission of a room status change; will do that in a separate
PR.
@ruancomelli
Copy link
Collaborator Author

This is a benchmark review for experiment mermaid_diagrams.
Run ID: mermaid_diagrams/benchmark_2024-09-20T14-09-29_v1-22-0-140-ga8d2a8b27-dirty.

This pull request was cloned from https://github.com/ably-labs/ably-chat-swift/pull/35. (Note: the URL is not a link to avoid triggering a notification on the original pull request.)

Experiment configuration
review_config:
  # User configuration for the review
  # - benchmark - use the user config from the benchmark reviews
  # - <value> - use the value directly
  user_review_config:
    enable_ai_review: true
    enable_rule_comments: false

    enable_complexity_comments: false
    enable_security_comments: false
    enable_tests_comments: false
    enable_comment_suggestions: false
    enable_functionality_review: false

    enable_pull_request_summary: false
    enable_review_guide: true

    enable_approvals: false

  ai_review_config:
    # The model responses to use for the experiment
    # - benchmark - use the model responses from the benchmark reviews
    # - llm - call the language model to generate responses
    model_responses:
      comments_model: benchmark
      comment_area_model: benchmark
      comment_validation_model: benchmark
      comment_suggestion_model: benchmark
      complexity_model: benchmark
      functionality_model: benchmark
      security_model: benchmark
      tests_model: benchmark
      pull_request_summary_model: benchmark
      review_guide_model: llm
      overall_comments_model: benchmark

# The pull request dataset to run the experiment on
pull_request_dataset:
- https://github.com/sourcery-ai/core/pull/4607
- https://github.com/sourcery-ai/core/pull/4631
- https://github.com/sourcery-ai/core/pull/4647
    # CodeRabbit examples:
- https://github.com/2lambda123/-Orange-OpenSource-oorobot/pull/15
- https://github.com/2lambda123/galaxyproject-galaxy/pull/12
- https://github.com/a0v0/avtoolz/pull/79
- https://github.com/adityask98/Hotaru/pull/10
- https://github.com/agdas/vscode/pull/2
- https://github.com/agluszak/hirschgarten/pull/2
- https://github.com/alexsnow348/insightface/pull/46
- https://github.com/alikuxac/utilities/pull/10
- https://github.com/AlphaDev87/timba-api/pull/49
- https://github.com/AngeloTadeucci/Maple2/pull/239
- https://github.com/AngeloTadeucci/Maple2.File/pull/36
- https://github.com/AngeloTadeucci/Maple2/pull/233
    # Examples where CodeRabbit does not generate diagrams
- https://github.com/baptisteArno/typebot.io/pull/1778
- https://github.com/btipling/foundations/pull/33
- https://github.com/btipling/foundations/pull/31
- https://github.com/chintu-777/jaeger/pull/1
- https://github.com/coji/remix-docs-ja/pull/55
- https://github.com/DaveMBush/SmartNgRX/pull/622
- https://github.com/DaveMBush/SmartNgRX/pull/481
- https://github.com/dkittle/party-connections/pull/6
- https://github.com/Drajad-Kusuma-Adi/onstudy-backend/pull/6
- https://github.com/imaami/libcanth/pull/2
  # Requested by Tim
- https://github.com/2lambda123/-Orange-OpenSource-oorobot/pull/15
- https://github.com/2lambda123/galaxyproject-galaxy/pull/12
- https://github.com/a0v0/avtoolz/pull/79
- https://github.com/adityask98/Hotaru/pull/10
- https://github.com/agdas/vscode/pull/2
- https://github.com/agluszak/hirschgarten/pull/2
- https://github.com/4DNucleome/PartSeg/pull/1183
- https://github.com/ably/ably-cocoa/pull/1973
- https://github.com/ably-labs/ably-chat-swift/pull/54
- https://github.com/ably-labs/ably-chat-swift/pull/35

# Questions to ask to label the review comments
review_comment_labels: []
# - label: correct
#   question: Is this comment correct?

# Benchmark reviews generated by running
#   python -m scripts.experiment benchmark <experiment_name>
benchmark_reviews:
- dataset_pull_request: https://github.com/sourcery-ai/core/pull/4607
  review_pull_request: https://github.com/sourcery-ai-experiments/core/pull/338
- dataset_pull_request: https://github.com/sourcery-ai/core/pull/4631
  review_pull_request: https://github.com/sourcery-ai-experiments/core/pull/339
- dataset_pull_request: https://github.com/sourcery-ai/core/pull/4647
  review_pull_request: https://github.com/sourcery-ai-experiments/core/pull/340
- dataset_pull_request: https://github.com/2lambda123/-Orange-OpenSource-oorobot/pull/15
  review_pull_request: https://github.com/sourcery-ai-experiments/-Orange-OpenSource-oorobot/pull/2
- dataset_pull_request: https://github.com/2lambda123/galaxyproject-galaxy/pull/12
  review_pull_request: https://github.com/sourcery-ai-experiments/galaxyproject-galaxy/pull/1
- dataset_pull_request: https://github.com/adityask98/Hotaru/pull/10
  review_pull_request: https://github.com/sourcery-ai-experiments/Hotaru/pull/2
- dataset_pull_request: https://github.com/agdas/vscode/pull/2
  review_pull_request: https://github.com/sourcery-ai-experiments/vscode/pull/3
- dataset_pull_request: https://github.com/agluszak/hirschgarten/pull/2
  review_pull_request: https://github.com/sourcery-ai-experiments/hirschgarten/pull/2
- dataset_pull_request: https://github.com/alikuxac/utilities/pull/10
  review_pull_request: https://github.com/sourcery-ai-experiments/utilities/pull/2
- dataset_pull_request: https://github.com/AlphaDev87/timba-api/pull/49
  review_pull_request: https://github.com/sourcery-ai-experiments/timba-api/pull/2
- dataset_pull_request: https://github.com/AngeloTadeucci/Maple2/pull/239
  review_pull_request: https://github.com/sourcery-ai-experiments/Maple2/pull/3
- dataset_pull_request: https://github.com/AngeloTadeucci/Maple2.File/pull/36
  review_pull_request: https://github.com/sourcery-ai-experiments/Maple2.File/pull/2
- dataset_pull_request: https://github.com/AngeloTadeucci/Maple2/pull/233
  review_pull_request: https://github.com/sourcery-ai-experiments/Maple2/pull/4
- dataset_pull_request: https://github.com/baptisteArno/typebot.io/pull/1778
  review_pull_request: https://github.com/sourcery-ai-experiments/typebot.io/pull/1
- dataset_pull_request: https://github.com/btipling/foundations/pull/33
  review_pull_request: https://github.com/sourcery-ai-experiments/foundations/pull/1
- dataset_pull_request: https://github.com/btipling/foundations/pull/31
  review_pull_request: https://github.com/sourcery-ai-experiments/foundations/pull/2
- dataset_pull_request: https://github.com/chintu-777/jaeger/pull/1
  review_pull_request: https://github.com/sourcery-ai-experiments/jaeger/pull/1
- dataset_pull_request: https://github.com/coji/remix-docs-ja/pull/55
  review_pull_request: https://github.com/sourcery-ai-experiments/remix-docs-ja/pull/1
- dataset_pull_request: https://github.com/DaveMBush/SmartNgRX/pull/622
  review_pull_request: https://github.com/sourcery-ai-experiments/SmartNgRX/pull/1
- dataset_pull_request: https://github.com/DaveMBush/SmartNgRX/pull/481
  review_pull_request: https://github.com/sourcery-ai-experiments/SmartNgRX/pull/2
- dataset_pull_request: https://github.com/dkittle/party-connections/pull/6
  review_pull_request: https://github.com/sourcery-ai-experiments/party-connections/pull/1
- dataset_pull_request: https://github.com/Drajad-Kusuma-Adi/onstudy-backend/pull/6
  review_pull_request: https://github.com/sourcery-ai-experiments/onstudy-backend/pull/1
- dataset_pull_request: https://github.com/imaami/libcanth/pull/2
  review_pull_request: https://github.com/sourcery-ai-experiments/libcanth/pull/1

@SourceryAI
Copy link

SourceryAI commented Sep 20, 2024

Reviewer's Guide by Sourcery

This pull request implements the ability to attach and detach a room in the AblyChat SDK. It introduces new protocols for real-time client interactions, adds asynchronous methods for attaching and detaching channels, and includes unit tests for the new functionality. The changes primarily focus on enhancing the DefaultRoom class and creating mock implementations for testing purposes.

File-Level Changes

Change Details Files
Implemented attach and detach functionality for rooms
  • Added attach() and detach() methods to DefaultRoom class
  • Implemented logic to attach and detach multiple channels associated with a room
  • Added error handling for attach and detach operations
Sources/AblyChat/Room.swift
Created new protocols for real-time client interactions
  • Introduced RealtimeClientProtocol, RealtimeChannelsProtocol, and RealtimeChannelProtocol
  • Extended Ably types to conform to new protocols
Sources/AblyChat/Dependencies.swift
Sources/AblyChat/AblyCocoaExtensions/Ably+Dependencies.swift
Added asynchronous extensions for Ably types
  • Implemented attachAsync() and detachAsync() methods for ARTRealtimeChannelProtocol
Sources/AblyChat/AblyCocoaExtensions/Ably+Concurrency.swift
Created mock implementations for testing
  • Implemented MockRealtime, MockChannels, and MockRealtimeChannel classes
  • Added support for simulating attach and detach operations in mocks
Tests/AblyChatTests/Mocks/MockRealtime.swift
Tests/AblyChatTests/Mocks/MockChannels.swift
Tests/AblyChatTests/Mocks/MockRealtimeChannel.swift
Added unit tests for DefaultRoom
  • Created tests for successful and failing attach operations
  • Created tests for successful and failing detach operations
Tests/AblyChatTests/DefaultRoomTests.swift
Updated existing files to use new protocols and implementations
  • Modified ChatClient to use RealtimeClientProtocol
  • Updated MockRealtime in example app to conform to new protocols
Sources/AblyChat/ChatClient.swift
Example/AblyChatExample/Mocks/MockRealtime.swift

Sequence Diagrams

Room Attachment Process

sequenceDiagram
    participant Client as ChatClient
    participant Room as DefaultRoom
    participant Channel as RealtimeChannel
    Client->>Room: attach()
    loop For each channel
        Room->>Channel: attachAsync()
        Channel-->>Room: Success/Error
    end
    alt All channels attached successfully
        Room-->>Client: Success
    else Any channel fails to attach
        Room-->>Client: Error
    end
Loading

Room Detachment Process

sequenceDiagram
    participant Client as ChatClient
    participant Room as DefaultRoom
    participant Channel as RealtimeChannel
    Client->>Room: detach()
    loop For each channel
        Room->>Channel: detachAsync()
        Channel-->>Room: Success/Error
    end
    alt All channels detached successfully
        Room-->>Client: Success
    else Any channel fails to detach
        Room-->>Client: Error
    end
Loading

Tips
  • Trigger a new Sourcery review by commenting @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
  • Continue your discussion with Sourcery by replying directly to review comments.
  • You can change your review settings at any time by accessing your dashboard:
    • Enable or disable the Sourcery-generated pull request summary or reviewer's guide;
    • Change the review language;
  • You can always contact us if you have any questions or feedback.

Copy link

@SourceryAI SourceryAI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hey @ruancomelli - I've reviewed your changes - here's some feedback:

Overall Comments:

  • Consider tracking the TODOs and @unchecked Sendable usages as separate issues to ensure they're addressed in future PRs.
Here's what I looked at during the review
  • 🟢 General issues: all looks good
  • 🟢 Documentation: all looks good

LangSmith trace

Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment to tell me if it was helpful.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants