Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Type checker updates and bug fixes #57

Merged
merged 21 commits into from
Oct 8, 2024
Merged

Type checker updates and bug fixes #57

merged 21 commits into from
Oct 8, 2024

Conversation

bryanlohxz
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

bryanlohxz added 20 commits April 15, 2024 00:01
@bryanlohxz
Add new ast extractor for type checker
83c03f6
@bryanlohxz
Remove old ast extractor and add new types
e77014d
@bryanlohxz
Remove old ast types
ac99dcb
@bryanlohxz
Rename astExtractor.ts to extractor.ts
1610365
@bryanlohxz
Rename javaSpecTypes.ts to specificationTypes.ts
8aa004c
@bryanlohxz
Fix import bug
25262b2
@bryanlohxz
Add types for compilation unit to type checker ast extractor
8980138
@bryanlohxz
Rename type checker ast extractor specification imports
f7fe949
@bryanlohxz
Add typing into type checker ast extractor
c395eec
@bryanlohxz
Change typechecker to use new AST
cb6234d
@bryanlohxz
Rename type checker errors label
6506b5b
@bryanlohxz
Add type interface
e0c2476
@bryanlohxz
Fix binary, unary and postfix type checking
1419547
@bryanlohxz
Add support for swtich statements
b320c69
@bryanlohxz
Add support for do statements
f9fd7d9
@bryanlohxz
Add support for try catch statements
4178d4d
@bryanlohxz
Add support for throw statements
39e196f
@bryanlohxz
Add location to type check error in return statement
df257da
@bryanlohxz
Add location to 2 typechecker errors that is missing location
c191228
@bryanlohxz
Refactor types system in type checker
69d6d0d
@bryanlohxz bryanlohxz self-assigned this Apr 23, 2024
@bryanlohxz bryanlohxz linked an issue Apr 23, 2024 that may be closed by this pull request
Type checker: more detailed type errors needed #53
Closed
@github-actions GitHub Actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Apr 23, 2024 •
edited
Loading

Coverage report

St.❔
 Category Percentage Covered / Total
🟡 Statements
72.72% (-3.48% 🔻)
 7033/9671
🔴 Branches
59.61% (-4.9% 🔻)
 2314/3882
🟡 Functions
67.78% (-7.82% 🔻)
 1256/1853
🟡 Lines
73.62% (-2.95% 🔻)
 6622/8995
Show new covered files 🐣
St.❔
 File Statements Branches Functions Lines
🟢
... / references.ts
 88.24% 69.57% 87.5% 91.67%
🟡
... / modifiers.ts
 70.37% 52.38% 63.64% 70%
🟢
... / throws.ts
 66.67% 100% 50% 80%
🟡 types/ast/utils.ts 78.95% 46.15% 62.5% 74.07%
🟡
... / operations.ts
 62.96% 51.72% 100% 62%
🟡
... / utils.ts
 76.92% 45.83% 83.33% 78.95%
🟢
... / statements.ts
 83.33% 77.78% 100% 87.5%
🔴
... / extractor.ts
 48.78% 37.05% 45.28% 52.98%
Show files with reduced coverage 🔻
St.❔
 File Statements Branches Functions Lines
🟢
... / index.ts
74.37% (-4.65% 🔻)
53.01% (-6.06% 🔻)
95.65% (-4.35% 🔻)
84.25% (-6.12% 🔻)
🟡 types/errors.ts
64.52% (-1.34% 🔻)
 0%
44.44% (-14.38% 🔻)
66.1% (-3.13% 🔻)
🟢
... / primitives.ts
 79.52%
60.26% (-3.85% 🔻)
 85.29% 82.09%
🔴 types/types/type.ts
34.62% (-32.05% 🔻)
 100%
11.11% (-38.89% 🔻)
34.62% (-32.05% 🔻)
🟡
... / classes.ts
65.22% (-9.78% 🔻)
47.37% (-2.63% 🔻)
45.45% (-14.55% 🔻)
68.35% (-6.16% 🔻)
🟢
... / methods.ts
84% (+3.42% 🔼)
73.53% (+17.97% 🔼)
72.73% (-11.14% 🔻)
85.71% (-1.94% 🔻)
🟢
... / arrayFactory.ts
87.1% (-0.78% 🔻)
77.78% (-2.22% 🔻)
 100% 100%
🟢
... / environment.ts
80% (-6.59% 🔻)
33.33% (-9.52% 🔻)
81.25% (-5.42% 🔻)
84.93% (-5.07% 🔻)
🟢
... / prechecks.ts
83.1% (-4.9% 🔻)
58.06% (-7.32% 🔻)
 100%
88.33% (-4.89% 🔻)
🟢
... / classFactory.ts
81.08% (-0.97% 🔻)
36.36% (-9.79% 🔻)
 100%
100% (+3.33% 🔼)
🔴 types/ast/index.ts
55.56% (-44.44% 🔻)
0% (-100% 🔻)
33.33% (-66.67% 🔻)
56% (-44% 🔻)

Test suite run success

1089 tests passing in 57 suites.

Report generated by 🧪jest coverage report action from f46b7b7

@bryanlohxz bryanlohxz linked an issue Apr 23, 2024 that may be closed by this pull request
compiler/type checker: syntax error causes uncaught exception #54
Closed
AprupKale

This comment was marked as duplicate.

Sign in to view

AprupKale
AprupKale approved these changes Oct 8, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@AprupKale AprupKale left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm 👍

@martin-henz martin-henz merged commit 9f53320 into main Oct 8, 2024
5 checks passed
@martin-henz martin-henz deleted the bryan/typechecking branch October 8, 2024 05:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@AprupKale AprupKale AprupKale approved these changes

Assignees

@bryanlohxz bryanlohxz

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

compiler/type checker: syntax error causes uncaught exception Type checker: more detailed type errors needed
3 participants
@bryanlohxz @AprupKale @martin-henz