-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 579
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
chore: display a unique interaction id alongside each error #5737
Open
sandor-trombitas
wants to merge
9
commits into
main
Choose a base branch
from
feat/CLI-680-interaction-id
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from 6 commits
Commits
Show all changes
9 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
e020277
chore: update output rendering of error catalog errors
sandor-trombitas 355caa7
chore: restore original assertions add in validation of metadata beha…
thisislawatts ae03e33
chore: rebuild error chain
thisislawatts 6e05bb8
test: add validation that nested ExitError are preserved
thisislawatts cdf4b3a
test: closed box validation of desired behaviour
thisislawatts 008d6ad
chore: refactor to append interaction id to error output
thisislawatts dcbe9be
chore: clean up -d flag
thisislawatts cdffc90
chore(deps): upgrade go-application-framework@04faf47716bb0f1a0580182…
thisislawatts 3314c9e
test: extend mock expect checks
thisislawatts File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Question: Showing the a single InteractionId can also be achieved in
OutputError()
and would keep the concerns of presenting errors separated from the orchestration logic in main. Is there a reason not to adaptOutputError()
so that it can also work for multiple errors at time point in the future?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
After syncing, we decided to wait for design input and then see what is the best way to continue.