chore: use more complex query for testing #34
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@johanneskoester has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 17 minutes and 29 seconds before requesting another review. How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. WalkthroughThe recent update modifies the Changes
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Files selected for processing (1)
- tests/tests.py (1 hunks)
Additional context used
Path-based instructions (1)
tests/tests.py (1)
Pattern
**/*.py: Do not suggest to add trailing commas.
Do not suggest type annotations for functions that are defined inside of functions or methods.
Additional comments not posted (1)
tests/tests.py (1)
20-20: LGTM! Verify the impact of the new S3 path structure.The change to a more complex S3 path structure in the
get_querymethod is straightforward and aligns with the objective of better organizing test files. Ensure that this change does not affect other parts of the codebase that might rely on the previous path structure.Verification successful
No impact on the codebase from the new S3 path structure.
The change to the new S3 path structure in the
get_querymethod does not affect other parts of the codebase, as the old path structure was not found elsewhere. This confirms that the modification is isolated to the test file.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the impact of the new S3 path structure in the codebase. # Test: Search for occurrences of the old path structure. Expect: No occurrences of the old path. rg --type python -A 5 $'"s3://snakemake-test-bucket/test-file.txt"'Length of output: 99
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the impact of the new S3 path structure in the codebase. # Test: Search for occurrences of the old path structure. Expect: No occurrences of the old path. rg '"s3://snakemake-test-bucket/test-file.txt"'Length of output: 49
|
Closing, already in #27. |
Summary by CodeRabbit