feat: allow undefined when property optional for exactOptionalPropertyTypes #1448
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
kuhe
force-pushed
the
fix/exact-optional
branch
from
87f0395
to
3988115
Compare
trivikr
approved these changes
Nov 12, 2024
siddsriv
approved these changes
Nov 12, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
If a member is
optional?:, it should allowundefined. The generated clients do not consider absence vs value-undefined to have a meaningful distinction.sample diff: aws/aws-sdk-js-v3#6653
completes aws/aws-sdk-js-v3#4017