-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
take pruning logic out of create_transaction logic #11845
Merged
Merged
Changes from 12 commits
Commits
Show all changes
17 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
0b2b537
take pruning logic out of create_transaction logic
poopoothegorilla 257153e
change prune queue function signature to return array of ids rather t…
poopoothegorilla f040a23
Merge branch 'develop' into jtw/refactor-create-transaction
poopoothegorilla 1b9c37e
Merge branch 'develop' into jtw/refactor-create-transaction
poopoothegorilla d4e5a03
refactor txmgr a little
poopoothegorilla 939d610
change order of pruning and creating transaction
poopoothegorilla fc2bbc5
Apply suggestions from code review
poopoothegorilla 13d35dd
address comments
poopoothegorilla 8052d49
fix tests
poopoothegorilla 14ae5ea
Merge branch 'develop' into jtw/refactor-create-transaction
poopoothegorilla a9b2f49
Merge branch 'develop' into jtw/refactor-create-transaction
poopoothegorilla 55d9ace
address comments
poopoothegorilla 676b07c
address comments
poopoothegorilla b026003
add pruneQueueAndCreateLock
poopoothegorilla 2d02c39
Merge branch 'develop' into jtw/refactor-create-transaction
poopoothegorilla 226ec84
Merge branch 'develop' into jtw/refactor-create-transaction
prashantkumar1982 21af152
Merge branch 'develop' into jtw/refactor-create-transaction
poopoothegorilla File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.
Oops, something went wrong.
Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.
Oops, something went wrong.
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.
Oops, something went wrong.
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This comments helps! But I'm not yet sure why we can't just use the queueSize. The prune is occurring before the create call right? This means that the new transaction isn't in the queue yet, so it should be safe to use s.queueSize as opposed to queueSize - 1 right?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The concern that prashant brought up was that if we didnt do a -1 we could end up with a queue size +1 above the max queue size. Here is an example
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
it would be only off by 1 if we chose to stick with queueSize, but let me know if i am not fully understanding your idea