-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 103
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[WIP] Split shopinvader in 2 modules base and product #1382
base: 14.0
Are you sure you want to change the base?
[WIP] Split shopinvader in 2 modules base and product #1382
Conversation
All this seems to be a hard work. Do you plan to finalize this work in the coming days or do you need some helo on it? Regards, lmi |
Hi @lmignon |
761073e
to
ff58e56
Compare
c1a5af5
to
0206922
Compare
Test are green !! \o/ |
@lmignon you can start to review |
@matthieusaison @sebastienbeau Thank you for this hard work. All this seems to go into the right way. I haven't found any issue at first read of this giant PR. |
ce9cf08
to
e42e684
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for this huge work!
Just one minor comment
|
If the partner do not belong to a specific company the profile is never set we should use the company of the binding (related backend), not the company of the partner
ba24e6e
to
fbf0de4
Compare
8159d58
to
6d3ed9e
Compare
Yes it's wanted, the variant case is now handle
in shopinvader_product_binding, because the class ShopinvaderVariant has
moved here too.
https://github.com/shopinvader/odoo-shopinvader/blob/6d3ed9e88adb1f6e718184dba1fd37506a690de8/shopinvader_product_binding/services/abstract_sale.py#L33
Le lun. 18 sept. 2023 à 17:40, Marie Lejeune ***@***.***> a
écrit :
… ***@***.**** commented on this pull request.
------------------------------
In shopinvader_restapi/services/abstract_sale.py
<#1382 (comment)>
:
> @@ -43,27 +43,14 @@ def _convert_step(self, sale):
def _is_item(self, line):
return True
+ def _get_product_information(self, line):
+ return {"id": line.product_id.id}
Before, due to the shopinvader product variant, we got all info about a
product inside the SO data (product name, prices, + various custom
fields...). Now I see that we just get the product ID. Is it wanted? What
are the benefits?
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#1382 (review)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/A5CI2NJ6AMSSISR4ILDKDQTX3BTPVANCNFSM6AAAAAAZ4EY2WM>
.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
There hasn't been any activity on this pull request in the past 4 months, so it has been marked as stale and it will be closed automatically if no further activity occurs in the next 30 days. |
Resolves #1372