-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 830
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
<sl-copy> #1483
Conversation
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
I love those improvements 👍 well done 💪 and I am fully onboard with the idea to baking the button into the copy component itself. |
Co-authored-by: Thomas Allmer <[email protected]>
Would we consider using sl-tooltip for the copied and error states, much like we do when copying icons in the icon docs? I totally agree with not swapping out the button. In general, we probably don't want to encourage users to change the label of the button either, although they certainly still could if they wanted to. (It's one button that always performs the same action, so that context would ideally remain the same for the end user.) |
From https://twitter.com/tobiasbu/status/1687187298884915200
That's a good point. It's a bit too magical, so we can probably do this with a second attribute: <sl-copy from="el"> (copies el.textContent by default)
<sl-copy from="el" attr="value"> (copies #el.value)
<sl-copy from="el" attr="href"> (copies #el.href) |
githubs copy button is imho doing a good job just as another point of reference 🤗 and here is the html for it seems another good point to go with one button...
what about tooltip direction? 🤔 |
The design problem for custom buttons seems eerily similar to that of I personally think that not allowing custom buttons, but allowing custom icons, is just fine, especially how simple it is compared to the alternatives. Allowing people to easily extend sl-copy and swap out the button rendering would be an easy path to customization too. Ultimately, customization, even for some fairly simple cases calls for a render-prop type of approach. This is because you don't know if the state of sl-copy should change attributes or children of the button or something else. Kevin on our team was working on a render-prop-like community protocol for cases like this. It would be a bit complex though. A somewhat simpler approach might be to define a protocol and microsyntax so that sl-copy can mutate its children. You could imagine attributes on sl-copy that have a syntax for setting attribute and content of the button. <sl-copy
value="Copy me"
success="icon='check'; #text='Copied!'"
error="icon='x-lg'; #text='Error!'">
<sl-button icon="files">Copy</sl-button>
</sl-copy>
Still a bit complicated though it doesn't require any JS. Subclassing is a quite easy implement customization approach if you wanted to allow that: import {html} from 'lit';
import {choose} from 'lit/directives/choose.js';
import {customElement} from 'lit/decorators/custom-element.js';
import {Copy} from '@shoelace-style/shoelace/dist/components/copy/copy.component.js';
@customElement('my-copy')
export class MyCopy extends Copy {
protected renderButton() {
return html`
<sl-button>${choose(this.state, [
['ready', () => 'Copy'],
['copied, () => 'Copied!'],
['error, () => 'Error']
])}</sl-button>`;
}
} |
@justinfagnani For me personally, I have 0 desire to introduce a DSL for this. I think this is where slots shine and we should embrace them. The big problem with swapping buttons is it means you lose focus state so you'd have to refocus to the new button when the new button comes in, and then once the error or success clears you need to refocus the initial button, which could be very jarring. I would say I expect buttons to be baked in. I would think the button is in an disabled state while in the success / error state anyways. <sl-copy value="<text to be copied>">
Copy
<span slot="success">
<sl-icon name="check"></sl-icon>
Copied successfully
</span>
<span slot="error">
<sl-icon name="x-lg"></sl-icon>
Error!
</span>
</sl-copy> |
imho the end result should be similar to the github copy button... users can provide content for each of those slots e.g. the maximum example would be <sl-copy value="<text to be copied>">
<span slot="copy-button"><sl-icon name="my-icon"></sl-icon></span>
<span slot="copy-msg">Do it!</span>
<span slot="success-button"><sl-icon name="my-success-icon"></sl-icon></span>
<span slot="success-msg">You did it <confetti></span>
<span slot="error-button"><sl-icon name="my-error-icon"></sl-icon></span>
<span slot="error-msg">Nope</span>
</sl-copy> it could also be written as attributes so the most common case will probably be to only set the success message <sl-copy value="<text to be copied>" success-msg="You did it"></sl-copy> there should be a default msg content for success and error and it only shows the tooltip if there is an actual message to show. |
any ways I can help? shall I prepare a PR with my proposed changes to this PR? 🤔
just a note: disabled buttons are not focusable so they would loose the focus as well... |
Thanks for the input. The latest changes seem promising. I've renamed it to The labels are localized and simple by default, but you can override them using attributes to provide more context to the user (e.g. "Copy source code" instead of just "Copy"). The button is now static, and only the icons can be changed via slot. Tooltips have been added back and are used to announce the label to screen readers. The <!-- Copies the span's textContent -->
<span id="my-phone">+1 (234) 456-7890</span>
<sl-copy-button from="my-phone"></sl-copy-button>
<!-- Copies the input's "value" property -->
<sl-input id="my-input" type="text" value="User input"></sl-input>
<sl-copy-button from="my-input.value"></sl-copy-button>
<!-- Copies the link's "href" attribute -->
<a id="my-link" href="https://shoelace.style/">Shoelace Website</a>
<sl-copy-button from="my-link[href]"></sl-copy-button> Let me know what you think of the updates. If this looks good, we can probably get this into the release next week as experimental. Latest preview: https://shoelace-ly2lsft6z-font-awesome.vercel.app/components/copy-button/ |
Added a couple things:
I'm going to merge this as experimental, but please keep the feedback coming! |
Just pointing out the release notes say the new component is Regardless I've already incorporated it into my project! |
I really like how the current API looks 👍 looking forward to using it. One minor detail - there is no simple way to disable the tooltip. <sl-copy-button copy-label=""></sl-copy-button> but this does "nothing" e.g. the default copy label is used |
I think you might be seeing an older preview. The current changelog for 2.7.0 shows the correct name, but let me know if I'm missing something.
The tooltip serves as the label. Without it, there would be no feedback for assistive devices. At some point, I was using labels but then it announced twice (once for the label, once for the tooltip). If we want to support this, we'd need an attribute like |
Ah I was going by https://github.com/shoelace-style/shoelace/releases/tag/v2.7.0 but I'll stick to the main site changelog going forward |
Hi! Did you figure out a way to disable the tooltip? |
I jumped the gun on merging #1473. It turns out the same issues I had with my initial stab at a copy component are still concerns. I reverted the PR so we can gather more feedback. Here's what I did and what the remaining concerns are. (I'm doing this from memory so I might be forgetting some things.)
Preview
https://shoelace-git-copy-font-awesome.vercel.app/components/copy/
Changes
<sl-copy>
for
tofrom
success
anderror
<sl-tooltip>
as a dependency to reduce the footprint of<sl-copy>
Concerns
My biggest issue is around customization. Ideally, the component will allow users to customize the icons and/or buttons. We're accomplishing that right now using three slots.
I know this was my suggestion, but after using it awhile, it feels like the wrong choice. The button itself shouldn't get swapped out, as it causes the trigger to lose focus and tooltips can't follow it so they disappear. It's also not intuitive to users why they need to provide three buttons when really it's the label they need to customize.
Perhaps the way forward here is to not allow arbitrary buttons, but bake the button in and allow it to be styled with CSS instead. Then we could use slots for just the icons, which feels a lot better.
The other thing is the animation. Cutting over without any animation felt jarring. I added a subtle one that makes it feel much better. (Excuse the choppy GIF)
But this doesn't really work for custom buttons. Well, it does, but it feels weird because it's intended for icons.
While I did make the animations customizable, I don't think they should apply to the entire slot, so baking the button in would solve this too.
TL;DR
I initially had a vision for this to be a generic utility component where you could control pretty much everything declaratively, but we might need to make it a bit more opinionated to solve these problems.
I'd also like to wait for @lindsaym-fa's feedback. Maybe having a proper design for this component will be helpful to steer it in the right direction.
I'd love to hear everyone's thoughts on this one.
/cc @daKmoR @KonnorRogers