Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fb #1799

Closed
wants to merge 58 commits into from
Closed

Fb #1799

wants to merge 58 commits into from

Conversation

Kp2478
Copy link

@Kp2478 Kp2478 commented May 20, 2023

Fb

cclauss and others added 30 commits July 7, 2022 13:19
generate unclaimed username based on regex
Added `--nsfw` tag in `Usage` prompt with the description matching the `help` prompt of the `parser`
Added `--nsfw` flag in documentation
Dockerfile: Upgrade Python
* GitHub Actions: python-version: [3.7, 3.8, 3.9, "3.10", 3.11]

* Update nightly.yml

* Update update-site-list.yml

* Python 3.7 thru 3.11
replaced flake8 with ruff
github-actions bot and others added 28 commits April 15, 2023 14:10
Recently, @ThePornHelper raised an issue related to OnlyFans false negative. After going through the issue, I tried checking for some popular onlyfans creators on sherlock and as per the issue raised all of them were giving false negative.

So, I checked with the current method of checking the username availability. It the following API url:

`https://onlyfans.com/api2/v2/users/grandmasterchefjojo`

It returns a 400 error code and doesn't work at all.

Why it's happening? It requires a token be passed in the headers to for it to work.

After this, I tried using BurpSuite to find any other way to check availability and unfortunately there aren't any.

Even the wrong onlyfans.com/thisusernamedoesntexist777 URL also returns 200 in HTTP response.

So, it's better to remove OnlyFans from supported sites list and add it to removed_sites.json

Thanks.
Recently, @ThePornHelper raised an issue related to OnlyFans false negative. After going through the issue, I tried checking for some popular onlyfans creators on sherlock and as per the issue raised all of them were giving false negative.

So, I checked with the current method of checking the username availability. It the following API url:

`https://onlyfans.com/api2/v2/users/grandmasterchefjojo`

It returns a 400 error code and doesn't work at all.

Why it's happening? It requires a token be passed in the headers to for it to work.

After this, I tried using BurpSuite to find any other way to check availability and unfortunately there aren't any.

Even the wrong onlyfans.com/thisusernamedoesntexist777 URL also returns 200 in HTTP response.

So, it's better to remove OnlyFans from supported sites list and add it to removed_sites.json

Thanks.
Recently, @ThePornHelper raised an issue related to OnlyFans false negative. After going through the issue, I tried checking for some popular onlyfans creators on sherlock and as per the issue raised all of them were giving false negative.

So, I checked with the current method of checking the username availability. It the following API url:

`https://onlyfans.com/api2/v2/users/grandmasterchefjojo`

It returns a 400 error code and doesn't work at all.

Why it's happening? It requires a token be passed in the headers to for it to work.

After this, I tried using BurpSuite to find any other way to check availability and unfortunately there aren't any.

Even the wrong onlyfans.com/thisusernamedoesntexist777 URL also returns 200 in HTTP response.

So, it's better to remove OnlyFans from supported sites list and add it to removed_sites.json

Thanks.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.