-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 22
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Refactor website to use Hugo and Docsy; Add a blog #202
Refactor website to use Hugo and Docsy; Add a blog #202
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Ricardo Zanini <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ricardo Zanini <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ricardo Zanini <[email protected]>
LGTM! Many thanks man ❤️ |
Signed-off-by: Ricardo Zanini <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ricardo Zanini <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ricardo Zanini <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ricardo Zanini <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ricardo Zanini <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ricardo Zanini <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Aside from the ordering comment, I think we should re-add the sponsors section, both in the website and the spec.
Even though Neuroglia is for now the only sponsor of the project (and as part of the latter I'm therefore biased), it did sponsor the project, and should therefore clearly appear as such, which also might incentivise others to move in.
We should also add a "buy us a coffe" kind of button, on both website and spec. Donators should also be visibly and explicitly thanked for their donations, and be tracked somewhere in the repo. The money we obtain should be invested for marketing and communication purpose, in other to grow our user base and widen adoption for the further stage of SW in the CNCF.
Signed-off-by: Ricardo Zanini <[email protected]>
@cdavernas can you take another review? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks great to me, many thanks!
Do you think you could display the other key features on the index, and provide small code snippets, like now?
I would need help with HTML + js to be able to use this: https://www.docsy.dev/docs/adding-content/shortcodes/#tabbed-panes It appears, but breaks the page. I think it's not meant to be used on the landing page. So maybe @JBBianchi could help in a future PR? I will take a lot of time to do it, which I don't have atm. What other key features you mean? |
Sure, we can have a look together. |
We have a lot more of those in the Readme:
And possibly even others worth mentioning... |
@cdavernas sure we can add them all, but don't you think it will get cluttered? Maybe 3 more to have an additional line? |
@ricardozanini Yeah, you are right. Maybe 3 more indeed |
@cdavernas I'll let you pick the other 3. 😛 |
Let's pick the 6 first, no? They feel like the most compelling to me. |
Signed-off-by: Ricardo Zanini <[email protected]>
@cdavernas if you're happy with the content now, feel free to merge :) |
@JBBianchi @cdavernas btw I created an issue to track the code section: #203 |
Signed-off-by: Ricardo Zanini <[email protected]>
@cdavernas one last thing: I've added the schema to the |
Signed-off-by: Ricardo Zanini <[email protected]>
Many thanks for submitting your Pull Request ❤️!
What this PR does / why we need it:
Special notes for reviewers:
Still, work todo:
Additional information (if needed):