Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

RFM69 radio link integration #87

Open
wants to merge 24 commits into
base: development
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

muebau
Copy link

@muebau muebau commented Oct 7, 2014

No description provided.

@lakeman
Copy link
Member

lakeman commented Oct 7, 2014

It looks like you're exclusively using TAB characters for indentation. We've been using the convention of indenting by 2 spaces, with TAB's representing 8 spaces. This difference makes it hard to see what you have actually changed.

Also it looks like you could easily rebase your last commit onto our development branch without needing to add any unnecessary merges into our commit history.

@muebau
Copy link
Author

muebau commented Oct 7, 2014

Hello,
what I would do:

  1. create a new (temp) branch from development.
  2. cherry pick my changes
  3. fix the formatting
  4. reset (--hard) the development branch to the (temp) branch
  5. send another pull request

For the future I would do "git pull --rebase" to avoid the problem in the future.

Would this help?
Do you have any suggestions of improvement?

@lakeman
Copy link
Member

lakeman commented Oct 7, 2014

git pull --rebase
and
git rebase -i [remote name]/development

Just create new commits until you think the current version is right, then
use rebase -i to squash everything that you think should be combined into
one patch.
While the end result is the same as reset --hard and / or cherry-picking,
rebase -i is a bit easier to control without losing changes IMHO.

On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 5:43 PM, muebau [email protected] wrote:

Hello,
what I would do:

  1. create a new (temp) branch from development.
  2. cherry pick my changes
  3. fix the formatting
  4. reset (--hard) the development branch to the (temp) branch
  5. send another pull request

For the future I would do "git pull --rebase" to avoid the problem in the
future.

Would this help?
Do you have any suggestions of improvement?


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#87 (comment)
.

@muebau muebau changed the title Initial radio link integration RFM69 radio link integration Oct 27, 2014
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants