Chore/no default built in dns

[L-jasmine]

No description provided.

[juntao]

Hello, I am a code review bot on flows.network. Here are my reviews of code commits in this PR.

---

The Pull Request "Chore/no default built in dns" primarily addresses two changes. The first is the removal of the built-in-dns feature from the default features in the Cargo.toml file. The second is an update of the wasmedge_wasi_socket package version from 0.5.1 to 0.5.2.

Given these modifications, several potential issues are worth mentioning:

1. Code dependent on the built-in-dns feature will now require explicit enabling, which may impact users and possibly test infrastructure.
2. There may be underlying dependencies within the codebase that could be affected by the absence of the built-in-dns feature.
3. The initial reasons for including the built-in-dns feature as default need to be scrutinized to ensure its removal doesn't create unintended consequences.
4. With the version update of wasmedge_wasi_socket, there could be compatibility concerns if targeted functionalities have been changed or removed.
5. The necessity of the version update itself could be questioned if no considerable functional updates, API changes, or bug fixes are brought about with version 0.5.2.

The primary findings from the review are:

1. The changes made in this PR are intentional, intended as a chore, and not expected to disrupt the codebase functionality significantly.
2. Communication is required about the removal of the built-in-dns feature as a default feature to the end-users.
3. Additional checks throughout the codebase are required to ensure dependency requisites are still being met without built-in-dns as a default feature.
4. More context around the wasmedge_wasi_socket version update is needed to identify any changes made and assess their potential impacts.

In conclusion, while the changes seem straightforward, they warrant a thorough investigation to gauge their potential impacts on users, dependencies, and the overall health of the project.

Details

Commit 8bb6b1b88e90617d3e6bcfc8fd44dd9111442e1a

This is a simple patch where the developer "zzz" has made changes to the Cargo.toml file, specifically in the section which declares the default features of the package. The key change is that the built-in-dns feature has been removed from the list of default features. Other features such as wasmedge_0_12 remain unaffected by this commit.

It appears that this change is made consciously as a part of a chore and is not likely to have a significant impact on the functionality of the codebase. However, as a reviewer, you may need to take the following consideration into account:

1. Users of this package should be informed of this change because any code that relies on built-in-dns being a default feature will need to update to explicitly enable this feature.
2. Any testing infrastructure that implicitly relied on built-in-dns being a default feature may need to be adjusted to account for this change.
3. Further checks should be made to ensure that no other dependencies in the codebase require the built-in-dns feature to be enabled as a default feature. If they do, they should be updated accordingly.
4. Lastly, it's crucial to understand the original reason for enabling the built-in-dns feature by default and ensure its removal doesn't contravene such reasons.

Commit 0a436d7679cc362a68d84baf2d05f3217c1bd675

The primary change made in this patch is the bumping of the version of the package wasmedge_wasi_socket from 0.5.1 to 0.5.2. This change is made in the Cargo.toml file which is a configuration file for a Rust project. The version update implies that some changes have been made to the project although the specific changes are not visible in the provided snippet.

Potential problems are hard to assess in this patch due to the lack of context. However, some potential issues could be:

1. Dependencies: If other projects depend on specific functionality that changed between versions 0.5.1 and 0.5.2, this could break those projects.

2. Version Control: If there have been no changes in functionality, APIs, or bug fixes between these versions then the version bump is unnecessary and could confuse users.

3. Code Review: There is the possibility that the code changes associated with this version bump are not included or visible in this patch. If that's the case, an assessment regarding the correctness, performance, safety, and readability of any new or updated code can't be made from this patch alone.

As a result, it's recommended to study the changes and effects that evolved between the two versions and re-analyze any associated risks. Furthermore, it's suggested that developers provide a more comprehensive description of the changes or improvements that justify the version bump.