Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support PowerPC64 LE architecture #237

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

runlevel5
Copy link

PowerPC64 LE on GNU/Linux runs perfectly too

PowerPC64 LE on GNU/Linux runs perfectly too
@marc0der
Copy link
Member

I'm curious about how this works, as we don't compile for this target. Please tell us the output of the following as I suspect you are falling back to the legacy bash scripts:

$ cat ~/.sdkman/var/platform

@runlevel5
Copy link
Author

$ cat ~/.sdkman/var/platform

SDKMAN 5.18.2

You are right. I was running the fallback bash version. Having said I can confirm the sdk native can be compiled successfully and individual cli (like help, version) could be run without giving any error

@marc0der
Copy link
Member

Great stuff! I'll try to get this working and let you know when it's done so you can test it.

@marc0der marc0der changed the title Update README Support PowerPC64 LE architecture May 26, 2024
@marc0der
Copy link
Member

@runlevel5 In the end, it wasn't so simple. Sorry. I would need to build support for this platform throughout our backend. Then, even if we can install the native version, your platform isn't supported by any of our vendors. Most importantly, a Java version isn't currently available on SDKMAN for powerpc64le.

So sadly, at this stage, we won't be able to support powerpc64le unless it gains more popularity.

@runlevel5
Copy link
Author

@marc0der thanks for the response. I do not think PowerPC64 would ever gain the popularity as that of amd64 or arm64 because its market has always been for the enterprises/big institutions.

I understand the limitation and drawbacks to support this architecture and not every project could afford in doing so.

@runlevel5 runlevel5 closed this Jul 19, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants