Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Backport perf-v15] fix(cassandra-stress): bump c-s version to 3.17.0 #9381

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 27, 2024

Conversation

mergify[bot]
Copy link

@mergify mergify bot commented Nov 26, 2024

bump c-s version to 3.17.0

Main reason for version change:

  • Using cassandra-stress 3.17 to mittigate
    Switch to ReplicaOrdering.RANDOM for select LBPs 32

Other Noticable Changes since the last version used in SCT:

  • Add support for hostname verification 31
  • Print thread dump on specific signals 27
  • Replace uninterruptible wait 26
  • Make it use DCAwareRoundRobinPolicy unless rack is provided 21
  • feature(docker): adding support for dependabot 19

Testing

  • [ ]

PR pre-checks (self review)

  • I added the relevant backport labels
  • I didn't leave commented-out/debugging code

(cherry picked from commit 02997a6)

Parent PR: #9296

Main reason for version change:

Using cassandra-stress 3.17 to mittigate
- Switch to ReplicaOrdering.RANDOM for select LBPs
  [32](scylladb/cassandra-stress#32)

Other Noticable Changes since the last version used in SCT:

- Add support for hostname verification
  [31](scylladb/cassandra-stress#31)
- Print thread dump on specific signals
  [27](scylladb/cassandra-stress#27)
- Replace uninterruptible wait
  [26](scylladb/cassandra-stress#26)
- Make it use DCAwareRoundRobinPolicy unless rack is provided
  [21](scylladb/cassandra-stress#21)
- feature(docker): adding support for dependabot
  [19](scylladb/cassandra-stress#19)

Signed-off-by: Dusan Malusev <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit 02997a6)
@fruch fruch merged commit 6216a42 into branch-perf-v15 Nov 27, 2024
7 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants