Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

INTEGRATION [PR#5195 > development/8.7] CLDSRV-402: optimize API #5233

Conversation

bert-e
Copy link
Contributor

@bert-e bert-e commented Jul 13, 2023

This pull request has been created automatically.
It is linked to its parent pull request #5195.

Do not edit this pull request directly.
If you need to amend/cancel the changeset on branch
w/8.7/improvement/CLDSRV-402-optimize-multiobjectdelete-api, please follow this
procedure:

 $ git fetch
 $ git checkout w/8.7/improvement/CLDSRV-402-optimize-multiobjectdelete-api
 $ # <amend or cancel the changeset by _adding_ new commits>
 $ git push origin w/8.7/improvement/CLDSRV-402-optimize-multiobjectdelete-api

Please always comment pull request #5195 instead of this one.

- Parallelism is increased to reduce the latency
- If the backend supports it, batching is used
- Batch the deletion of objects from storage
- Flag to disable or enable the optimization, as well as
  a way to tune it.
…multiobjectdelete-api' into w/8.6/improvement/CLDSRV-402-optimize-multiobjectdelete-api
…imize-multiobjectdelete-api' into w/8.7/improvement/CLDSRV-402-optimize-multiobjectdelete-api
@bert-e bert-e mentioned this pull request Jul 13, 2023
williamlardier and others added 3 commits July 13, 2023 17:10
…multiobjectdelete-api' into w/8.6/improvement/CLDSRV-402-optimize-multiobjectdelete-api
…-api' into tmp/octopus/w/8.7/improvement/CLDSRV-402-optimize-multiobjectdelete-api
@bert-e bert-e merged commit 1cb54a6 into development/8.7 Jul 13, 2023
@bert-e bert-e deleted the w/8.7/improvement/CLDSRV-402-optimize-multiobjectdelete-api branch July 13, 2023 16:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants