-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12
Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
- Loading branch information
1 parent
f7c2807
commit be83356
Showing
2 changed files
with
8 additions
and
1 deletion.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
be83356
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I like having R-CMD check and Github actions set up, but one issue is that I do want this to go to CRAN eventually (probably by year's end or January or so), and for that to happen I'll have to remove the cmdstanr dependency. But it does make sense to leave it in for now -- probably I'll make a CRAN branch when that happens.
be83356
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Also ideally for an R CMD Check we render the file package_test_v2.Rmd as that contains simulations of most models. Even more ideal would be some kind of Rhat output from that file that we can then scan for outliers etc.
But what we have now is a great start for making the package more stable! Thanks!
be83356
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yes this is just to get the ball rolling on CI. Are you not thinking about a testthat (or equivalent) type of setup for your tests? then we should definitely add them to the GH actions
I feel like making this package CRAN-compliant might take a moment :-)
be83356
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
be83356
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
be83356
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yep, compliance with CRAN policies -- especially the least important ones -- is incredibly annoying in my experience as well