-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 435
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix: fixes schema extraction with nested union refs #8096
base: next
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
1 Skipped Deployment
|
No changes to documentation |
Component Testing Report Updated Dec 19, 2024 11:24 AM (UTC) ✅ All Tests Passed -- expand for details
|
⚡️ Editor Performance ReportUpdated Thu, 19 Dec 2024 11:26:16 GMT
Detailed information🏠 Reference resultThe performance result of
🧪 Experiment resultThe performance result of this branch
📚 Glossary
|
1b22b56
to
8f6799f
Compare
8f6799f
to
3005a89
Compare
This was seen in a schema produced by automated tooling. The recursion guard was too strict in this case as the two occurrences of a reference ending up having the same guard path name and extraction would therefore abort before looking inside the second one, instead returning `{}` which would fail when attempting to inspect the name field a little lower down.
3005a89
to
6ecf11f
Compare
I tried updating the snapshots using
I checked and that's the same on |
This was seen in a schema produced by automated tooling. The recursion
guard was too strict in this case as the two occurrences of a
reference ending up having the same guard path name and extraction
would therefore abort before looking inside the second one, instead
returning
{}
which would fail when attempting to inspect the namefield a little lower down.