Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Modify DKTK_Strat_SPECIMEN to improve the search more sample centric #163

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jan 22, 2025

Conversation

patrickskowronekdkfz
Copy link
Contributor

@patrickskowronekdkfz patrickskowronekdkfz commented Aug 20, 2024

This PR introduces a new stratifier for DKTK sample-specific search, while keeping the existing stratifier intact to ensure backwards compatibility.

This feature needs to be merged in Lens as well, with PR samply/lens#163.

This was tested locally with a lens+spot+beam+focus+blaze setup and with our test server.

@enola-dkfz
Copy link
Member

When changing DKTK CQL, please also add @thkoehler11 as a reviewer.

@enola-dkfz
Copy link
Member

Would you also be so kind to copy all the DKTK CQL snippets in preparation for CQL generation in Focus, as I explained in the Focus chat?

@TKussel
Copy link
Member

TKussel commented Dec 19, 2024

I can't review CQL changes, so I requested reviews from @thkoehler11 and @enola-dkfz

@enola-dkfz
Copy link
Member

I do not know the requirements of DKTK, so I am letting Thomas review the CQL. I can only confirm that this change will not break focus in general, and might only cause unwanted behaviour in DKTK.

thkoehler11
thkoehler11 previously approved these changes Jan 15, 2025
enola-dkfz
enola-dkfz previously approved these changes Jan 15, 2025
@TKussel
Copy link
Member

TKussel commented Jan 15, 2025

@patrickskowronekdkfz will update this PR with some additional specimen related CQL changes, I will review after that.

@enola-dkfz
Copy link
Member

@patrickskowronekdkfz will update this PR with some additional specimen related CQL changes, I will review after that.

This PR should be converted to draft then so that someone doesn't accidentally merge it.

@enola-dkfz enola-dkfz marked this pull request as draft January 20, 2025 08:48
@patrickskowronekdkfz patrickskowronekdkfz marked this pull request as ready for review January 20, 2025 10:11
@patrickskowronekdkfz
Copy link
Contributor Author

@thkoehler11 please re-review the PR. Now contains the FFPE samples as well

@patrickskowronekdkfz patrickskowronekdkfz force-pushed the feat/specimen_improved_search branch from f349f94 to 828134f Compare January 20, 2025 13:09
@TKussel TKussel requested a review from thkoehler11 January 20, 2025 13:53
@enola-dkfz enola-dkfz self-requested a review January 20, 2025 13:58
@enola-dkfz enola-dkfz dismissed stale reviews from thkoehler11 and themself January 20, 2025 13:58

new commits

@patrickskowronekdkfz patrickskowronekdkfz merged commit ed0b9ac into develop Jan 22, 2025
33 checks passed
@patrickskowronekdkfz patrickskowronekdkfz deleted the feat/specimen_improved_search branch January 22, 2025 13:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants