-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 102
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Cleanup of deprecated functions + Behavioral Clarifications #307
Open
roypat
wants to merge
12
commits into
rust-vmm:main
Choose a base branch
from
roypat:deprecation-cleanup
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+275
−819
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
12 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
5e62fa9
fix: move .cargo/config to .cargo/config.toml
roypat 1264194
fix: remove superfluous calls to `.subslice` in io.rs
roypat 57a64a8
Clarify behavior of `VolatileMemory::compute_end_offset`
roypat 9c352ea
Drop assert from `read/write_volatile` in `GuestMemory`
roypat 14443b8
Implement `VolatileMemory::get_slice` in terms of `subslice`
roypat 32f1579
add `retry_eintr!` utility macro
roypat 59f7daa
Introduce `VolatileSlice::truncate`
roypat d971028
chore: remove deprecated methods
roypat 24330dc
fix: move volatile memory access methods to `Bytes` trait
roypat bb6f869
doc: clarify behavior of `Bytes::read` and co
roypat e4f291d
chore: update coverage
roypat 37b015b
Merge branch 'main' into deprecation-cleanup
roypat File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
File renamed without changes.
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ | ||
{ | ||
"coverage_score": 91.41, | ||
"coverage_score": 92.92, | ||
"exclude_path": "mmap_windows.rs", | ||
"crate_features": "backend-mmap,backend-atomic,backend-bitmap" | ||
} |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I agree that the non-volatile read/write method are not sound for
Bytes
, but mayberead_exact_from
/write_all_to
could be added toByteValued
?