-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Feature gating *declarations* => new crate rustc_feature
#66895
Merged
Merged
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
14 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
3d080a4
introduce crate rustc_feature and move active, accepted, and removed …
Centril 048201f
move Stability to rustc_feature
Centril 8ad4d15
move AttributeTemplate to builtin_attrs
Centril 6cab02c
simplify gated cfgs logic
Centril 4d9fde5
builtin_attrs: inline some strings
Centril d04b838
move is_builtin_attr to syntax::attr
Centril 70234f1
builtin_attrs.rs -> rustc_feature
Centril db89679
inline two explanation constants
Centril b45f21d
move UnstableFeatures -> rustc_feature
Centril 9626181
check.rs: inline a constant
Centril b756b7d
tidy: adjust feature gating path
Centril 91fcd40
update rustc_feature crate docs
Centril 79077f1
move GateIssue to rustc_feature & simplify emit_feature_err
Centril ded177a
derive(Default) for Features
Centril File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
why move away from a struct with field names to a tuple?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If you look above, the constant contains the tuples already -- I'm introducing a type alias for that. The
struct GatedCfg
withspan
andindex
was actively harmful; imo it became clearly cleaner using.find(...)
instead. Ostensibly we could store the constant as a list of structs instead, but it doesn't seem worth it given the number of times the type is referenced and used?