Skip to content

Allow htmldocck.py to run using Python 3 #44086

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 26, 2017

Conversation

kennytm
Copy link
Member

@kennytm kennytm commented Aug 25, 2017

No description provided.

@kennytm
Copy link
Member Author

kennytm commented Aug 25, 2017

cc @QuietMisdreavus (#44026 (comment))

@shepmaster
Copy link
Member

Hmm. This is a tricky one. Let's try to pin a review on...

r? @Mark-Simulacrum

@shepmaster shepmaster added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Aug 25, 2017
@Mark-Simulacrum
Copy link
Member

@bors r+ rollup

Seems fine to me, though I have not worked much with Python code in the past.

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Aug 25, 2017

📌 Commit 6a72131 has been approved by Mark-Simulacrum

alexcrichton added a commit to alexcrichton/rust that referenced this pull request Aug 26, 2017
…imulacrum

Allow `htmldocck.py` to run using Python 3
frewsxcv added a commit to frewsxcv/rust that referenced this pull request Aug 26, 2017
…imulacrum

Allow `htmldocck.py` to run using Python 3
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 26, 2017
Rollup of 7 pull requests

- Successful merges: #43776, #43966, #43979, #44072, #44086, #44090, #44091
- Failed merges:
@bors bors merged commit 6a72131 into rust-lang:master Aug 26, 2017
@kennytm kennytm deleted the htmldocck-python3 branch August 27, 2017 05:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants