-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.3k
Rollup of 7 pull requests #31993
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Rollup of 7 pull requests #31993
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Had a discussion at https://www.reddit.com/r/rust/comments/488mjv/borrowing_or_returning_ownership/ about how an example could be worded more clearly and tried to take my recommendation and expand upon it with further information provided in the post.
Redirects existing links for more details on primitive types in the `core` module to the ones that exist in the `std` module.
Hello. Quite a few of the links in the `core` module concerning redirection to additional primitive type documentation are broken. I noticed in rust-lang#30214 that there seemed to be a consensus with linking across to `std` module documentation from the `core` module. This is what I've done with the `core` modules for primitive types. If the changes here are good to go forward with, I'll happily tend to adding more documentation links for the extension traits in the aforementioned issue if need be. r? @steveklabnik
Same as rust-lang#31923 but without the submodule updates.
This builds on some of the other relnotes PRs in the queue.
Previously it was rendering like this: http://i.imgur.com/ODFPdFW.png
Had a discussion at https://www.reddit.com/r/rust/comments/488mjv/borrowing_or_returning_ownership/ about how an example could be worded more clearly and tried to take my recommendation and expand upon it with further information provided in the post.
@bors: r+ p=1 |
📌 Commit fbe9f10 has been approved by |
r? @brson (rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 1, 2016
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
checked_neg
in 1.7 release notes. #31978, Clarified the details of a borrowing example. #31984, Grammar: 'fewer' instead of 'less' #31987, Bump to 1.9 #31992