Skip to content

Fix the f16/f128 feature gates on integer literals #139294

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 3, 2025

Conversation

beetrees
Copy link
Contributor

@beetrees beetrees commented Apr 3, 2025

The feature gating logic for f16/f128 currently only checks float literals, meaning this code currently compiles with no feature gates on stable (playground):

fn main() {
    let a = 1f16;
    let b = 1f128;
    dbg!(a, b);
}

This PR fixes that.

Tracking issue: #116909

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Apr 3, 2025

r? @fmease

rustbot has assigned @fmease.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Apr 3, 2025
@beetrees beetrees changed the title Fix the f16/f128 feature gate on integer literals Fix the f16/f128 feature gates on integer literals Apr 3, 2025
@fmease
Copy link
Member

fmease commented Apr 3, 2025

Wow, this is bad! Thanks a lot, very good catch!

I don't think anyone is relying on this since you can't do a whole lot with them (type names are unstable, library functions except operators and trait impls are unstable). Therefore I'll approve this as is and accept potential breakages.

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Apr 3, 2025

📌 Commit 62fcb9d has been approved by fmease

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Apr 3, 2025
m-ou-se added a commit to m-ou-se/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 3, 2025
…ure-gate, r=fmease

Fix the `f16`/`f128` feature gates on integer literals

The feature gating logic for `f16`/`f128` currently only checks float literals, meaning this code currently compiles with no feature gates on stable ([playground](https://play.rust-lang.org/?version=stable&mode=debug&edition=2024&gist=b0c0e285ccb822fc7e2abc595557886b)):
```rust
fn main() {
    let a = 1f16;
    let b = 1f128;
    dbg!(a, b);
}
```
This PR fixes that.

Tracking issue: rust-lang#116909
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 3, 2025
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 7 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#139080 (Experimental feature gate for `super let`)
 - rust-lang#139145 (slice: Remove some uses of unsafe in first/last chunk methods)
 - rust-lang#139149 (unstable book: document import_trait_associated_functions)
 - rust-lang#139273 (Apply requested API changes to `cell_update`)
 - rust-lang#139282 (rustdoc: make settings checkboxes always square)
 - rust-lang#139283 (Rustc dev guide subtree update)
 - rust-lang#139294 (Fix the `f16`/`f128` feature gates on integer literals)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 3, 2025
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 7 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#139080 (Experimental feature gate for `super let`)
 - rust-lang#139145 (slice: Remove some uses of unsafe in first/last chunk methods)
 - rust-lang#139149 (unstable book: document import_trait_associated_functions)
 - rust-lang#139273 (Apply requested API changes to `cell_update`)
 - rust-lang#139282 (rustdoc: make settings checkboxes always square)
 - rust-lang#139283 (Rustc dev guide subtree update)
 - rust-lang#139294 (Fix the `f16`/`f128` feature gates on integer literals)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 29c0fe7 into rust-lang:master Apr 3, 2025
6 checks passed
rust-timer added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 3, 2025
Rollup merge of rust-lang#139294 - beetrees:fix-f16-f128-literal-feature-gate, r=fmease

Fix the `f16`/`f128` feature gates on integer literals

The feature gating logic for `f16`/`f128` currently only checks float literals, meaning this code currently compiles with no feature gates on stable ([playground](https://play.rust-lang.org/?version=stable&mode=debug&edition=2024&gist=b0c0e285ccb822fc7e2abc595557886b)):
```rust
fn main() {
    let a = 1f16;
    let b = 1f128;
    dbg!(a, b);
}
```
This PR fixes that.

Tracking issue: rust-lang#116909
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.88.0 milestone Apr 3, 2025
@beetrees beetrees deleted the fix-f16-f128-literal-feature-gate branch April 3, 2025 19:17
github-actions bot pushed a commit to model-checking/verify-rust-std that referenced this pull request Apr 8, 2025
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 7 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#139080 (Experimental feature gate for `super let`)
 - rust-lang#139145 (slice: Remove some uses of unsafe in first/last chunk methods)
 - rust-lang#139149 (unstable book: document import_trait_associated_functions)
 - rust-lang#139273 (Apply requested API changes to `cell_update`)
 - rust-lang#139282 (rustdoc: make settings checkboxes always square)
 - rust-lang#139283 (Rustc dev guide subtree update)
 - rust-lang#139294 (Fix the `f16`/`f128` feature gates on integer literals)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants