Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

CI: split i686-mingw job to two free runners #135813

Draft
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

marcoieni
Copy link
Member

@marcoieni marcoieni commented Jan 21, 2025

Split the i686-mingw job in two to move it to free runners and reduce the use of large runners in CI. Related to rust-lang/infra-team#189

This job failed only twice in the last month, so splitting it into two jobs shouldn't introduce more flakiness in the CI.

image

Datadog link for the infra team.

r? @ghost

try-job: i686-mingw-1
try-job: i686-mingw-2

@rustbot rustbot added A-testsuite Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-infra Relevant to the infrastructure team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Jan 21, 2025
@marcoieni
Copy link
Member Author

@bors try

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jan 21, 2025

⌛ Trying commit 1bbdc85 with merge 384efee...

bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 21, 2025
…<try>

CI: split i686-mingw job to two free runners

try-job: i686-mingw-1
try-job: i686-mingw-2
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jan 21, 2025

☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions
Build commit: 384efee (384efeeb8d29643ebcd89d9f6cc912bf76185594)

@marcoieni
Copy link
Member Author

@bors try

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jan 21, 2025

⌛ Trying commit 1bbdc85 with merge e9bcdbf...

bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 21, 2025
…<try>

CI: split i686-mingw job to two free runners

try-job: i686-mingw-1
try-job: i686-mingw-2
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jan 21, 2025

☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions
Build commit: e9bcdbf (e9bcdbf19fb7df842f9db7bfefa003987d0ba8c9)

@marcoieni
Copy link
Member Author

marcoieni commented Jan 21, 2025

mingw1 is too slow. I need to check the logs and see what are the slowest operations
image

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-testsuite Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-infra Relevant to the infrastructure team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants