Rollup of 6 pull requests #127296
Merged
Rollup of 6 pull requests #127296
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…estebank Change return-type-notation to use `(..)` Aligns the syntax with the current wording of [RFC 3654](rust-lang/rfcs#3654). Also implements rustfmt support (along with making a match exhaustive). Tracking: * rust-lang#109417
…ieril More refactorings to rustc_interface Follow up to rust-lang#126834
Update LLVM submodule Fixes rust-lang#112548 and unlock rust-lang#125642. r? ``@cuviper`` or ``@nikic``
…rameters-check, r=estebank Fix incorrect suggestion for extra argument with a type error Fixes rust-lang#126246 I tried to fix it in the `find_errors` of ArgMatrix, but seems it's hard to avoid breaking some other test cases. The root cause is we eliminate the first argument even with a type error at here: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/6292b2af620dbd771ebb687c3a93c69ba8f97268/compiler/rustc_hir_typeck/src/fn_ctxt/checks.rs#L664 So the left argument is always treated as extra one. But if there is already a type error, an error message will be generated firstly, which make this issue a trivial one.
…rustdoc-io-error, r=jieyouxu Disable rmake test rustdoc-io-error on riscv64gc-gnu In rust-lang#126917 we disabled `inaccessible-temp-dir` on `riscv64gc-gnu` because the container runs the build as `root` (just like the `armhf-gnu` builds). Tests creating an inaccessible test directory are not possible, since `root` can always touch those directories. https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/553a69030e5a086eb3841d020db8c9c463948c72/src/ci/docker/host-x86_64/disabled/riscv64gc-gnu/Dockerfile#L99 This means the tests are run as `root`. As `root`, it's perfectly normal and reasonable to violate permission checks this way: ```bash $ sudo mkdir scratch $ sudo chmod o-w scratch $ sudo mkdir scratch/backs $ ``` Because of this, this PR makes the test ignored on `riscv64gc` (just like on `armhf-gnu`) for now. As an alternative, I believe the best long-term strategy would be to not run the tests as `root` for this job. Some preliminary exploration was done in rust-lang#126917 (comment), however that appears a larger lift. ## Testing > [!NOTE] > `riscv64gc-unknown-linux-gnu` is a [**Tier 2 with Host Tools** platform](https://doc.rust-lang.org/beta/rustc/platform-support.html), all tests may not necessarily pass! This change should only ignore `inaccessible-temp-dir` and not affect other tests. You can test out the job locally: ```sh DEPLOY=1 ./src/ci/docker/run.sh riscv64gc-gnu ``` r? `@jieyouxu`
Less magic number for corountine
rustbot
added
A-run-make
|
@bors r+ rollup=never p=6 |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
|
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
|
📌 Perf builds for each rolled up PR:
previous master: aa1d4f6826 In the case of a perf regression, run the following command for each PR you suspect might be the cause: |
|
Finished benchmarking commit (b454012): comparison URL. Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed@rustbot label: -perf-regression Instruction countThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. Max RSS (memory usage)Results (primary -6.7%, secondary 0.2%)This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
CyclesResults (secondary -0.1%)This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
Binary sizeThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. Bootstrap: 724.291s -> 742.044s (2.45%) |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Successful merges:
(..)#127092 (Change return-type-notation to use(..))r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup
Create a similar rollup