Skip to content

Suggest naming types before using explicit type names #14996

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

samueltardieu
Copy link
Contributor

@samueltardieu samueltardieu commented Jun 6, 2025

missing_transmute_annotations will suggest naming the origin and destination types if they do not have explicit names already.

changelog: [missing_transmute_annotations]: suggest giving origin and destination types a name in order to ascribe the transmute call

Fixes #14984

`missing_transmute_annotations` will suggest naming the origin and
destination types if they do not have explicit names already.
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Jun 6, 2025

r? @Alexendoo

rustbot has assigned @Alexendoo.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties label Jun 6, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

missing_transmute_annotations suggests impl Future which is not allowed
3 participants