Skip to content

Do not suggest using Error in no_std before Rust 1.81 #13834

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 16, 2024
Merged

Do not suggest using Error in no_std before Rust 1.81 #13834

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 16, 2024

Conversation

samueltardieu
Copy link
Contributor

changelog: [result_unit_err]: do not suggest using Error in no_std mode before Rust 1.81

Fix #9767

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Dec 15, 2024

r? @llogiq

rustbot has assigned @llogiq.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties label Dec 15, 2024
@llogiq llogiq added this pull request to the merge queue Dec 16, 2024
@llogiq
Copy link
Contributor

llogiq commented Dec 16, 2024

Thank you!

Merged via the queue into rust-lang:master with commit 968669b Dec 16, 2024
9 checks passed
@samueltardieu samueltardieu deleted the push-ornorplwpyxp branch December 30, 2024 23:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees

@llogiq llogiq

Labels
S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[check_result_unit_err]: Recommended fix not possible in no_std
3 participants
@samueltardieu @rustbot @llogiq