Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

other-reprs: do not make it sound like we are making ABI promises for repr(int) enums #461

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 19, 2025

Conversation

RalfJung
Copy link
Member

Until something like rust-lang/rust#128600 lands, let's be careful what we say about this.

Also mention that repr(C) generally makes this behave the same as C ABI-wise. That's anyway what people already assume this means and are relying on in practice, so there's no point in not saying it IMO?

Cc @rust-lang/opsem @chorman0773

Copy link

@CAD97 CAD97 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just a note for review, otherwise 👍 from me

knowledge of "invalid" values at this type to optimize enum layout, such as when
this enum is wrapped in `Option`). Note that the function call ABI for these
types is still in general unspecified, except that across `extern "C"` calls they
are ABI-compatible with C enums of the same sign and size.
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just to point this out here as well, C has non-transitive rules that allow enum and the underlying integer type to be punned by ABI.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah I saw that comment in the issue. I don't think that's something to discuss here though -- they key point is that the Rust thing matches the C thing.

Non-transitive compatibility doesn't really make sense IMO but that's a discussion for another day.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I've run into problems with cfi tags on methods involving enums in the signature. You probably want to be careful about what you promise here. Unfortunately I don't know what the precise rules are CFI wise.

Copy link
Contributor

@ehuss ehuss left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

Information like this should probably go in the reference first. I'll go ahead and approve here, but I think it would be good to have a more deliberate specification over there.

@ehuss ehuss added this pull request to the merge queue Feb 19, 2025
Merged via the queue into rust-lang:master with commit 8f5c732 Feb 19, 2025
2 checks passed
compiler-errors added a commit to compiler-errors/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 25, 2025
Update books

## rust-lang/book

2 commits in d4d2c18cbd20876b2130a546e790446a8444cb32..4a01a9182496f807aaa5f72d93a25ce18bcbe105
2025-02-24 14:48:34 UTC to 2025-02-13 19:29:47 UTC

- Fix typos in chapter 17 (rust-lang/book#4238)
- NoStarch backports (rust-lang/book#4224)

## rust-lang/edition-guide

2 commits in 8dbdda7cae4fa030f09f8f5b63994d4d1dde74b9..daa4b763cd848f986813b5cf8069e1649f7147af
2025-02-22 14:58:51 UTC to 2025-02-21 02:30:17 UTC

- Remove precise capturing features (rust-lang/edition-guide#362)
- use same name as previous example (rust-lang/edition-guide#360)

## rust-lang/nomicon

1 commits in 336f75835a6c0514852cc65aba9a698b699b13c8..8f5c7322b65d079aa5b242eb10d89a98e12471e1
2025-02-19 13:16:47 UTC to 2025-02-19 13:16:47 UTC

- other-reprs: do not make it sound like we are making ABI promises for repr(int) enums (rust-lang/nomicon#461)

## rust-lang/reference

4 commits in 6195dbd70fc6f0980c314b4d23875ac570d8253a..615b4cec60c269cfc105d511c93287620032d5b0
2025-02-18 23:01:53 UTC to 2025-02-13 15:12:49 UTC

- Add rule identifiers to names chapters (rust-lang/reference#1737)
- Switch from AVX to SSE in the example (rust-lang/reference#1735)
- Remove attributes from struct field rest patterns (rust-lang/reference#1736)
- Update reference for target_feature_11. (rust-lang/reference#1720)
rust-timer added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 25, 2025
Rollup merge of rust-lang#137552 - rustbot:docs-update, r=ehuss

Update books

## rust-lang/book

2 commits in d4d2c18cbd20876b2130a546e790446a8444cb32..4a01a9182496f807aaa5f72d93a25ce18bcbe105
2025-02-24 14:48:34 UTC to 2025-02-13 19:29:47 UTC

- Fix typos in chapter 17 (rust-lang/book#4238)
- NoStarch backports (rust-lang/book#4224)

## rust-lang/edition-guide

2 commits in 8dbdda7cae4fa030f09f8f5b63994d4d1dde74b9..daa4b763cd848f986813b5cf8069e1649f7147af
2025-02-22 14:58:51 UTC to 2025-02-21 02:30:17 UTC

- Remove precise capturing features (rust-lang/edition-guide#362)
- use same name as previous example (rust-lang/edition-guide#360)

## rust-lang/nomicon

1 commits in 336f75835a6c0514852cc65aba9a698b699b13c8..8f5c7322b65d079aa5b242eb10d89a98e12471e1
2025-02-19 13:16:47 UTC to 2025-02-19 13:16:47 UTC

- other-reprs: do not make it sound like we are making ABI promises for repr(int) enums (rust-lang/nomicon#461)

## rust-lang/reference

4 commits in 6195dbd70fc6f0980c314b4d23875ac570d8253a..615b4cec60c269cfc105d511c93287620032d5b0
2025-02-18 23:01:53 UTC to 2025-02-13 15:12:49 UTC

- Add rule identifiers to names chapters (rust-lang/reference#1737)
- Switch from AVX to SSE in the example (rust-lang/reference#1735)
- Remove attributes from struct field rest patterns (rust-lang/reference#1736)
- Update reference for target_feature_11. (rust-lang/reference#1720)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants