-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 385
Update to latest nightly #963
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
@bors r+ |
📌 Commit 20b10cc has been approved by |
💔 Test failed - checks-travis |
osx failure due to rust-lang/rust-clippy#4576 (comment) |
@RalfJung should we turn off osx for now or wait until it's fixed? |
@bors r+ seems it's fixed |
📌 Commit 9fdb347 has been approved by |
💔 Test failed - checks-travis |
So the issue is that cargo stable is broken on macOS? Because I think that is the only cargo we are using here. Is this related to the 1.38 release? |
Looks fixed now... strange. @bors r+ |
📌 Commit 9f6287e has been approved by |
@@ -59,5 +59,5 @@ cargo_miri = ["cargo_metadata", "directories", "rustc_version"] | |||
rustc_tests = [] | |||
|
|||
[dev-dependencies] | |||
compiletest_rs = { version = "0.3.22", features = ["tmp", "stable"] } | |||
compiletest_rs = { version = "0.3.23", features = ["tmp"] } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Did clippy make the same feature switch? If not, this will likely trigger the duplicate complication check when we update Miri in rustc.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah, half year ago: rust-lang/rust-clippy@a8ce9d6
😀
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lol.^^
That makes me wonder why we did not trigger the aforementioned check all along. Oh well.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's under dev-dependencies
, it doesn't end up in the binary.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
But the purpose of the check is ti reduce build times. Binary or not shouldn't matter.
@RalfJung previously the same thing happened. It worked as PR build but failed as merge build. |
|
Oh dang. Looks like the build cache for the |
@bors r+ |
📌 Commit 2701599 has been approved by |
💔 Test failed - checks-travis |
@bors r+ |
📌 Commit 76c76b4 has been approved by |
💔 Test failed - checks-travis |
@bors r+ |
📌 Commit c424e06 has been approved by |
☀️ Test successful - checks-travis, status-appveyor |
No description provided.