Skip to content

Update to latest nightly #963

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Sep 28, 2019
Merged

Update to latest nightly #963

merged 4 commits into from
Sep 28, 2019

Conversation

oli-obk
Copy link
Contributor

@oli-obk oli-obk commented Sep 26, 2019

No description provided.

@oli-obk
Copy link
Contributor Author

oli-obk commented Sep 26, 2019

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 26, 2019

📌 Commit 20b10cc has been approved by oli-obk

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 26, 2019
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 26, 2019

⌛ Testing commit 20b10cc with merge c1b1513...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 26, 2019

💔 Test failed - checks-travis

@oli-obk
Copy link
Contributor Author

oli-obk commented Sep 26, 2019

osx failure due to rust-lang/rust-clippy#4576 (comment)

@oli-obk
Copy link
Contributor Author

oli-obk commented Sep 26, 2019

@RalfJung should we turn off osx for now or wait until it's fixed?

@oli-obk
Copy link
Contributor Author

oli-obk commented Sep 26, 2019

@bors r+

seems it's fixed

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 26, 2019

📌 Commit 9fdb347 has been approved by oli-obk

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 26, 2019

⌛ Testing commit 9fdb347 with merge c9eb8d4...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 26, 2019
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 26, 2019

💔 Test failed - checks-travis

@RalfJung
Copy link
Member

So the issue is that cargo stable is broken on macOS? Because I think that is the only cargo we are using here. Is this related to the 1.38 release?

@RalfJung
Copy link
Member

Looks fixed now... strange.

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 27, 2019

📌 Commit 9f6287e has been approved by RalfJung

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 27, 2019

⌛ Testing commit 9f6287e with merge 4943c24...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 27, 2019
@@ -59,5 +59,5 @@ cargo_miri = ["cargo_metadata", "directories", "rustc_version"]
rustc_tests = []

[dev-dependencies]
compiletest_rs = { version = "0.3.22", features = ["tmp", "stable"] }
compiletest_rs = { version = "0.3.23", features = ["tmp"] }
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Did clippy make the same feature switch? If not, this will likely trigger the duplicate complication check when we update Miri in rustc.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah, half year ago: rust-lang/rust-clippy@a8ce9d6
😀

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lol.^^
That makes me wonder why we did not trigger the aforementioned check all along. Oh well.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It's under dev-dependencies, it doesn't end up in the binary.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

But the purpose of the check is ti reduce build times. Binary or not shouldn't matter.

@mati865
Copy link
Contributor

mati865 commented Sep 27, 2019

@RalfJung previously the same thing happened. It worked as PR build but failed as merge build.

@mati865
Copy link
Contributor

mati865 commented Sep 27, 2019

cargo 1.39.0-beta (b6c6f685b 2019-09-19) that expalins build error (cargo bump was backported or promoted to beta) but why are merge builds using beta instead of stable?

@RalfJung
Copy link
Member

Oh dang. Looks like the build cache for the auto branch is not in the state it should be in.

@RalfJung
Copy link
Member

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 27, 2019

📌 Commit 2701599 has been approved by RalfJung

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 27, 2019
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 27, 2019

⌛ Testing commit 2701599 with merge 3134fc5...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 27, 2019

💔 Test failed - checks-travis

@RalfJung
Copy link
Member

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 27, 2019

📌 Commit 76c76b4 has been approved by RalfJung

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 27, 2019

⌛ Testing commit 76c76b4 with merge 6d20980...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 27, 2019
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 27, 2019

💔 Test failed - checks-travis

@RalfJung
Copy link
Member

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 28, 2019

📌 Commit c424e06 has been approved by RalfJung

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 28, 2019

⌛ Testing commit c424e06 with merge af1a19d...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 28, 2019
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 28, 2019

☀️ Test successful - checks-travis, status-appveyor
Approved by: RalfJung
Pushing af1a19d to master...

@bors bors merged commit c424e06 into master Sep 28, 2019
@RalfJung RalfJung deleted the rustup branch September 28, 2019 14:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants