-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 145
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix match_with_constraint
#4499
base: develop
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
CTerm.constraint
seems to have two different uses.
b7c5bff
to
d5bcbd2
Compare
ec7162c
to
4fa4e82
Compare
Since #4628 determines the |
4fa4e82
to
298df8a
Compare
Downstream Validation: Other ReposNo direct use. CTerm.matchThe following check carries some risk because Lines 158 to 159 in 4fa4e82
Cterm.anti_unifyReturn a correct constraint. KCFG.create_coverReturn a correct constraint. KCFG.lift_split_edgeNeed Refactor KCFG.lift_split_splitNeed Refactor KCFG.merge_nodeNeed Simplify |
Fixes #4496