Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
911 lines (891 loc) · 51.9 KB

outline-of-topics.md

File metadata and controls

911 lines (891 loc) · 51.9 KB

Outline of Topics, Sources & Themes

Agricultural commons

  • ongoing history of enclosures and struggles to maintain the commons
  • the evolution of property rights alienation of the land (see Quia Emptores)
  • contradictions of US public lands, land grant colleges, nat'l parks, etc.
  • land trusts and resurgence of cooperative farming practices

Sutainability politics

Appropriation of agricultural knowledge, expertise and technology

See also

The Commons in Sociology & Economics

Anarchist, Marxist & Autonomist Theory

Social Choice Theory

U.S. Opposition Movements to Intellectual Property

Free & Open Source Software (FOSS)

  • bad actors:
    • Richard Stallman
    • Eric S. Raymond
    • etc

Free Culture Movement

Criticism

  • Low marginal costs and non-rivalry are over-emphasized and consequently taken as the preconditions for effective commons
  • It is implicitly and mistakenly assumed that information is not a "thing" like real property. Likewise, tangible things are viewed as substantively different from information and their informational component is either minimized or overlooked entirely.

90's Anti-Globalization Movements

Protest movements following the Global Economic Crisis

Arab Spring

Occupy

SOPA/PIPA & Internet Blackout

Beyond FOSS

New Developments & Old Syntheses

Footnotes

  1. In Ecology of Freedom, §9 "Two Images of Technology":

    That Marx and many of his Victorian contemporaries disparaged "nature idolatry" in extremely harsh terms is not accidental. The Romantic movement of the nineteenth century echoed a much broader and ancient sensibility: the view that production should be a symbiotic, not an antagonistic, process. Although the movement was primarily aesthetic, it combined with anarchist theories of mutualism — notably Kropotkin's extraordinarily prescient writings — to ferret out a much broader "natural design": a "marriage" between labor and nature that was conceived not as a patriarchal domination of "man" over nature but as a productive relationship based on harmony, fertility, and creativity. Libertarian and aesthetic movements in the nineteenth century were still heir to the image of a fecund interaction between humanity's craft and nature's potentialities. But labor was seen not as "fire," or industry as a "furnace." The imagery of these movements was drastically different. Labor was viewed as the midwife, and tools as the aids, in delivering nature's offspring: use-values.[source]